What does it take to be a decent human being?

“Right Things, Right Now: Good Values, Good Character, Good Deeds” by Ryan Holiday

This is the third book out of the four-part Stoic virtue series of Courage, Discipline, Justice, and Wisdom.

In this neatly organized book, the author, Ryan Holiday, breaks down the trait of justice into several chapters with the following themes: keep your words, tell the truth, take responsibility, be your own referee, be good and not great, be an open book or transparent, be decent, do your job, keep your hands clean, integrity is everything, realize your potential, be loyal, choose a north star (something to reach towards), the importance of timing, the importance of being kind, see how the other half lives, you have to help, start small, create alliances, be powerful and sometimes show power, practice pragmatism, develop competence, the importance of giving, grow a coaching tree, look out for the little guy, make good trouble, climb your second mountain (second act in life), don’t do things for the recognition, give them hope, be an angel, on forgiveness, make amends, the great oneness, expand the circle, find the good in everyone, give the full measure of devotion, love wins, and pay it forward.

As usual for his writing style, Holiday uses plenty historical examples to make his excellent points, from political figures as Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses S. Grant, Mahatma Gandhi; to writers and poets like Walker Percy, Hesiod; sportsperson like golfer Patrick Reed, runners Abel Kiprop Mutai and Ivan Fernandez Anaya, tennis player Arthur Ashe; whistleblower like Frank Serpico and Cynthia Cooper; dancer Martha Graham; architect and inventor Buckminster Fuller; to many more historical figures such as Mother Teresa, Carl Jung, Ponticus, Florence Nightingale; and of course the usual Stoic heroes Marcus Aurelius, Seneca, Chrysippus, Cato, and others.

This time around, however, the book feels too repetitive, rushed, and while he mentions a lot of historical figures Holiday only uses the same selection of US-centric historical examples for his core arguments. Most notably Harry Truman, who is mentioned almost in every single chapter of the book, even more so than the Stoics, and so much so that the book could become a semi-autobiography of him.

And what’s with the extra effort to portray Truman as a near-saint figure? The truth is, Truman remains the only world leader in history that decided to use atomic bomb to inflict mass casualties on the enemy’s population. He is also responsible for “curbing” the spread of communism in Greece and Turkey, or in an unfiltered words, he’s staged a war in Europe to kill the organic spread of an ideology that happens to oppose US interests. But of course these huge chunk of Truman’s history are not mentioned in the book.

Moreover, throughout the book Truman is characterized as a principled man who champions justice, honesty, and selflessness, among others, which are undoubtedly true. But there’s also another side of the man, one that made a controversial decision based on the lobbying by a close friend Jacobson, which turned him into an accomplice to a brutal neo-colonial project. But in the book, it got brushed off under the label of “loyalty” to a friend. Also not mentioned in the book is Truman’s racist tendencies, where he often used racial slurs, told racist jokes, and called Martin Luther King Jr. a troublemaker. Pretty ironic since the Civil War movement is the second most dominating story in the book. What’s with the whitewashing?

If I didn’t follow Holiday for years and read 12 out of 15 of his books, I would probably get easily misled to think that he’s building up Truman’s image only to justify some of his sins and their spillover effect till today, most specifically his one decision told in the chapter “create alliances.” Decision that becomes this one elephant in the room that Holiday didn’t mention but addresses everything around it: like the chapter “keep going back” that lists all of the brutal events throughout history, which was even elaborated in chapter “make amends”, but Holiday then conveniently forgot to mention this 1 brutal event in both cases (an event that other modern Stoic Donald Robertson is boldly vocal about).

I mean, if you don’t want to discuss current affairs, that’s understandable. But why discuss everything about current world politics, also saying that you’re divesting from Belarus because the country supports Putin’s aggression in Ukraine, even went to a great length to paint this victimhood picture of one side, only to completely ignore what they’ve done ever since? The things written in chapters “be an angel”, “you have to help”, “the great oneness”, and “find the good in everyone” confirm this.

What happened with all the things preached in the book about courage in the face of unfairness, about not being indifferent and not choosing the safe option of being “neutral” while ignoring the huge injustice that is actually happening? Is this why the book was delayed by half a year after something happened just before the usual launch date for the Stoic virtue series? Is this why the content (not the organizational) of this book is kind of messy and unlike his other works that are meticulously researched and neatly written with good flow, because it was heavily edited halfway through?

Nevertheless, to be fair it isn’t so much about what has been said, but what has NOT been said. And Holiday already has a big deposit in my credibility bank that he deserves the benefit of the doubt. And when we see the book from a personal-development lens, in the end of the day it is a good book. It teaches us to ultimately become a decent human being with a clear conscience, someone who has integrity and a great sense of fairness, and will act accordingly even though sometimes our actions to do the right things will cost us.

“It’s not virtue signaling to push back against cruelty and indifference,” Holiday remarks at his conclusion. “It doesn’t make you a “social justice warrior” to speak out for kindness and fairness and inalienable rights. But even if it was, is anything better to be a warrior for than justice and or anything better to signal than virtue? What has to happen to your brain to be opposed to those things?” Yes Ryan, what has to happen?

Haruki Murakami on writing and running

“What I Talk About When I Talk About Running” by Haruki Murakami

This book is a wonderful autobiography that focuses on his love of running. Why he picks up the running habit at 33, his gradual training from zero to running a marathon, why and how he makes running one of his daily habits, his struggle during sluggish days when he didn’t feel like running, his most enjoyable runs, his worst marathon race, his experience on several ultra marathon race, and many more, all of which are poured into this very honest memoir.

The book is also a part of a memoir of his other love, writing. It is inserted between his stories of training and races, as a big part of his life, which is so very fascinating as we can see the daily routine of a novelist, including his thought process, how he process inspiration into a written words, and the everyday nitty gritty as a writer.

It is a short book, but filled with a lot of gems. I thoroughly enjoyed reading it.

Life at a second-hand bookshop

Days at the Morisaki Bookshop by Satoshi Yagisawa

They call the area Jimbocho. It is a neighbourhood in Tokyo that is home to more than 170 bookshops, which makes it the largest book store area in the world. And deep inside Jimbocho there’s a little wooden building where 25-year-old Takako once lived for months at the 2nd floor of her uncle’s bookshop.

Takako never liked reading books, she instead stays there mending a broken heart while struggling to get out of bed most of the time after breaking up with her cheating boyfriend and quitting her job altogether. But then as summer turns to autumn she begins to get to know her eccentric uncle, the regular customers, the people in the neighbourhood coffee shop filled with gossip and friendly banters, and the many books that have become a part of her daily life.

It is a heartwarming novel about a journey of getting lost and self-discovery, with twists revealed slowly as the book progresses, like what happens with her uncle’s wife who abruptly left 5 years ago. It is truly hard to put down once we start reading it, such a beautifully-written book.

5 lives in Japan

What You Are Looking For Is in the Library by Michiko Aoyama

This is a short novel about 5 different walks of lives: a shopkeeper, a furniture manufacturer, a former magazine editor, an unemployed person, and a retired person. Each single one of them have a very different life from one another, but they all have 1 thing in common, the same community library that turns their lives for the better after a recommendation of the perfect book by the librarian. It is such a charming and heart-warming book, filled with the everyday scenes of a life in Japan.

The summary of all religion

The Religions Book (DK Big Ideas) by DK

This is an impressive book about the evolution of religion, written in a concise manner that sums up everything in short articles format.

The book covers the most primitive forms of beliefs scattered around the world in the early days of humanity, like those practiced by the Chewong tribe in indigenous Malaysia, the belief of the Quechua Indians, the belief of the Dogon people in Bandiagara Plateu in Mali, and so much more.

It also addresses the ubiquitous rise of sophisticated philosophies everywhere, from the era of pioneering Axial age to the complicated web of schisms among major religions in latter centuries in human history.

Moreover, the book then dives deep into the few surviving modern global religion that we know in the world today, such as Hinduism, Buddhism, Judaism, Christianity and Islam.

It’s astonishing to see how humans have always reflect the image of their respective deities in their customs and rituals, and it’s even more fascinating to see how cultures evolve through time alongside the evolution of their respective religion.

Even today. Where at the last part, the book also shows the ongoing evolution of the modern religion, such as Rastafarianism, Mormonism, Sikhism, Santeria, Baha’i, and many more, who are one way or another a reflection of an ever growing natural progress from the major modern religion.

In short, this is without a doubt one of the most complete books about world religion, presented in the most digestible ways.

The compact travel guide summarised from Anthony Bourdain’s TV shows

“World Travel: An Irreverent Guide” by Anthony Bourdain and Laurie Woolever

This is a book about world travels through the eyes of Anthony Bourdain, written by his long-time collaborator Laurie Woolever.

Laurie was no stranger for Tony. They met a while back ago in 2002, when she was hired to edit and test the recipes for Tony’s Les Halles Cookbook. She then started to work as his assistant in 2009 where she also became involved with numerous editing and writing projects, alongside the ground-level tasks of an assistant, and they also collaborated in writing another cookbook in 2015 called Appetites.

This book was supposed to be their third collaboration. However, Tony’s busy travelling schedules meant that the project got postponed several times, that is, until Tony’s shocking death.

Now, I love Tony. I’ve watched almost all of his travel shows, from No Reservations to Parts Unknown, I watch them when I’m happy and when I’m sad, I watch them when I’m ill, sometimes I just put them as a background as I do other stuffs around the house, I even showed his shows to my kids since they were toddlers. We love his no-bullshit and brutally honest approach on life and travel. And I was pretty heartbroken when hearing about his death.

This travel book, in many ways, has a nostalgic feel about Tony. It is written by Laurie with the intention to re-live all the things that Tony himself had said about these places, in a style that Laurie would know best as one of the closest person ever lived with Tony.

As Laurie remarks, “I’d spent enough time in daily correspondence with Tony to have a good sense of the way he’d choose his words and set his rhythm. He wrote nearly impeccable prose, but on the occasion when it needed a bit of tidying or fleshing out, I was able to do that, I think, without detection.”

All the countries, the sights, the art, the food, the people are all vividly described just like it was in Tony’s shows. And in a way, the book seems to be intended as the complimentary show notes for the shows, where we get more of the details such as the name of the places, the addresses, how to get there, the prices, the short history, etc.

And along the way, Laurie provides so many quotations from Tony that is fitting with the country that is being covered, which makes it feel as if Tony is still alive and well. Such an enjoyable book to read, loving every minute of reading it.

The art of public speaking and winning arguments

Win Every Argument: The Art of Debating, Persuading, and Public Speaking by Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan is one of my favourite journalists. And I’ve been following his work from his columnist/political editor days at the New Statesman, the Guardian, the Huffington Post, to his brilliant Oxford-style debate show at Al Jazeera English, to his time at the Intercept and Deconstructed podcast, his stint at Peacock and MSNBC, to now his long-overdued own media, Zeteo.

At many points in his brilliant career I thought to my self, if ever Mehdi writes a book, I will buy it and read it straight away, no matter on what subject it is. But I never thought that he would actually write a book about his number one trade secret: his ability to win arguments! My God, Mehdi, are you out of your mind? 🙂

So yes, this book feels like a cheat sheet of his “secret formula”, one that, for his own sake, makes me afraid that he’s revealing way too much for any potential opposition. And just like seeing the blueprint behind any magnificent work, the book does not disappoint one bit.

In this book he discusses a lot of debating techniques used by great orators of the past – from Cicero, to Churchill, MLK, Mandela and many others – which makes a fascinating read right from the start. He then back them up with the psychological theories behind the techniques and provides a lot of examples from history and from his own experience, the latter of which serves like a highlight reel to a great footballer’s career.

You know how the better the book, the longer it takes for us to read it and the longer our notes are? This book took me 4x longer than my usual reading pace and I took a s**t ton of notes from it (where it feels like I’ve highlighted like 60% of the book). But I’m not going to spill all of its trade secrets here. It is already “bad” enough that he reveals them all, I’m not going to contribute on spreading it.

But the key, non-in-depth and non-linear, summary is as follows:

  1. Research both sides of the argument.
  2. Know your audience.
  3. Grab their attention.
  4. Connect with them.
  5. Show emotions and not just facts.
  6. How to reach the heart? 1. Tell a story 2. Choose the words carefully 3. Show, not just tell.
  7. Show the receipt.
  8. Ad Hominem: Attack the argument AND the credibility of the person.
  9. The importance of listening.
  10. The rule of three.
  11. Produce a zinger.
  12. Use memorable one liners.
  13. Set up a booby trap.
  14. Use the opponent’s own comments or opinions from the past.
  15. Learn the dirty tricks used by others too, like the gish gallop technique: flooding the argument with utter nonsense but in an abundant amount so that the opponent doesn’t have the time to address it one by one (Donald Trump’s weapon of choice).
  16. Project confidence.
  17. Use humor.
  18. Use self talk.
  19. Keep calm.
  20. Practice your debates.
  21. Do your homework.
  22. Have a grand finale.

Now, almost everyone can come up with this logical list, in fact a lot of books have done it. But what sets Mehdi apart from the rest is his reasoning behind the techniques that he chose to use in many different situations, how he time them, and even how he prepared for them.

And to that end, Mehdi is one of the best in his field of work, one of the very best at the art of debating, and thus reading this book is like as if Serena Williams is writing a book about tennis, or Steven Spielberg writing about movie directing, or Warren Buffett writing about investing. It is simply a book that should be the main required reading for any serious debate club.

Tschüss mein freund

Another German leaving my world, just after Jürgen Klopp did so in less than 2 weeks ago!

I’ve lived in this city for the majority of my life, but I’ve never seen it the way I did with you. From 5 stars to “kaki 5”, from the expat bubble to dodgy markets, from bar hopping to museum exploring, music festival, football matches, a failed stand-up comedy night, to a Halloween running event chased by monsters, and of course from the many independent book stores to our favourite spot the vintage book area in Blok M.

Ah yes, the books, the things that brought us together in the first place. I think it’s a borderline miracle that I can meet probably the only person who is as crazed with books as I do, with range of topics that we are either familiar with (and can talk about it endlessly) or we complement each other with our own special interests that are new for each other. Like fiction and literature, my God how on Earth did you manage to get me to read fictions?

Which brings us to Buru Quartet. Funny how it takes a foreigner to introduce me to the best Indonesian literature ever written, Pramoedya Ananta Toer’s Buru Quartet, and encouraged me to read it in its original language. My language. And then introduced me to the weird and wonderful and interesting writings like from Stuart Jeffries, Albert Camus, Chuck Palahneuk, Benedict Anderson, and several others including the funniest book that I’ve ever read: Why We Took the Car.

This alone has made you one of the most influential persons that I’ve ever crossed paths with. But between Kemal becoming a Borrusia Mönchengladbach fan and Kirana learning how to swear in German, we also found a family friend in you guys. Om Fred and tante Pia. A relationship that has the feel that it is only the beginning.

Jakarta won’t be the same without you roaming around with your scooter or chilling at Coffeebeerian. Going to the bookstores won’t last for hours now that I’m unable to discuss ideas with you. But c’est la vie, the universe has other [better] plans that look very exciting indeed. I couldn’t be more happier for you.

Have a great new chapter in life my friend, let’s continue our conversations online, and see you next year!

The meaning of life for an emotionless person

“The Stranger” by Albert Camus

This is a novel about a life lived by someone with a detached moral code and a difficulty to experience, identify, and express emotions.

It is written through the first-person vantage point of the main character, Meursault, who lives in a poor and violent neighbourhood in Algiers, Algeria, but who crucially marches on in his life without attaching meaning (and indeed, emotions) to anything.

And that is what makes his story interesting, considering that his life involves all the spectrum of emotions: romantic relationship, the death of his mother, a psychotic neighbour, a violent friend, and even a deathly encounter with a stranger that involves a murder, all of which he goes through without really a hint of grief, fear, joy, anger, remorse, disgust, sadness, etc.

The narrative itself is quite simple, but filled with so many philosophical interpretation and dilemma, with existentialism theme at its core. Because reading about how Meursault responds to the events of his surrounding can make us think about our place within society, and how meaningful or meaningless events can be if we detach all emotions from it.

It is quite the philosophical journey from a book of only 123 pages long, a book that made Albert Camus won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1957 and, among many others, inspired The Cure to write the song “Killing an Arab.”

And upon further investigation, it is believed that the Meursault character is based on Camus’ real-life friend Galindo, who is an intelligent but odd person that exhibits the social and personal characteristic impairment of Asperger’s syndrome.

What happened on 30 September 1965 and its impact to the world

“The Jakarta Method: Washington’s Anticommunist Crusade and the Mass Murder Program that Shaped the World” by Vincent Bevins

The date was 18 May 1958. In the island of Maluku in Eastern part of Indonesia, there is an increasingly violent separatist movement that suspiciously uses weapons bore the mark of a manufacturer in Plymouth, Michigan. The rebellion is also occurring elsewhere like in the Western island of Sumatra, but it is in Maluku that the tension escalates into air bombings by mysterious fighter pilots, hitting Indonesian military, commercial shipping vessels, and even a crowded market.

But then, on this day, 18 May, the Indonesians managed to shoot down one of the planes, with a single person floated down on a parachute and eventually captured by the Indonesian soldiers. His name is Allen Lawrence Pope, from Miami, Florida. And he is a CIA agent.

This is an incredible account of one of the most turbulent periods in world politics, the post-World War 2 era that quickly transitioned into the Cold War period of the 1950s-1980s. Within this period of time the battle of ideology was in its full force, with US capitalism in one side and Soviet communism in the other, with a lot of “Third World countries” swing from one ideology to the other, often done through violence. This book is the clearest explanation about the method behind this violence, the one that the US first perfected in Jakarta in 1965.

Indonesia in the Sukarno era was a chaotic place. The young country was experiencing many teething problems that come after independence in 1945, which stemmed from 3 centuries worth of colonialism. And most crucially the country adopts a multiparty system that embraces all parts and classes of the society, including Partai Komunis Indonesia (the Indonesian Communist Party or PKI for short).

I must admit, by just reading its name PKI gives me chills, due to a constant propaganda since elementary school. But unlike the common stigma of atheism and barbarism, the book shows that PKI actually consists of religious people who sees Muslim unity as a revolutionary and anti-colonial force. As the author Vincent Bevins remarks, “[t]here were committed Muslim Communists who wanted to create an egalitarian community—inspired to varying degrees both by Marx and the Koran—but felt that foreign infidels were holding them back. And for almost everyone in the country, “socialism” by definition implied opposition to foreign domination and support for an independent Indonesia.”

And under the leadership of D. N. Aidit, the PKI transformed from a rebel party (with infamous uprising incident in Madiun in 1948) into a “mass-based, legal, ideologically flexible movement that rejected the armed struggle, frequently ignored Moscow’s directions, stuck close to Sukarno, and embraced electoral politics.” They also distance themselves from the way the Chinese communist party do thing after the Sino-Soviet split, and instead they form an anti-feudal “united national front” with the local bourgeoisie and wont implement socialism “until the end of century.” In other words, there’s arguably little communist DNA left in this 3rd largest communist party in the World after Soviet and China.

Moreover, in their day-to-day life the PKI increasingly added active members or cadres who took a pledge to uphold party ethics. It also ran a number of affiliated organizations such as BTI (mass civilian participation), SOBSI (union worker member that includes much of the country’s working class), LEKRA (the cultural organization that provides concerts, plays, dances, and comedy shows in small towns), and Gerwani (the women’s movement group).

Indeed, they’re anti-imperialists first and foremost, with party members growing their movement by legally winning democratic elections and winning the hearts and minds of the people though their organizational works. Which is exactly what scared Washington.

But PKI was not the only concern for them. The Indonesian charismatic leader Sukarno was a force to be reckoned with, who attempted to place Indonesia high up in the ranks of powerful countries. And instead of aligning Indonesia with US imperialism he instigated the Asian-African Conference in Bandung in 18-24 April 1955, to solidify the idea of the Third World. As Bevins explains, “[t]his remarkable gathering brought the peoples of the colonized world into a movement, one that was opposed to European imperialism and independent from the power of the US and the Soviet Union.” And as you may have guessed, this did not bode well with Washington.

But things are never straight forward in politics, and this is where the strength of the book lies. It perfectly captures all the intricate detail about the geopolitics dealings without getting too complicated. And it shows that Indonesia did still got offered economic and military aid from the Soviet Union, but in alignment with its neutral position in the Cold War, Indonesia said it wouldn’t take any more than the Americans offered. That is, until 1958 when Allen Pope and other CIA operatives burned Indonesians alive and open the lid to their real intention, that Indonesia finally took the Soviet aid and became a stronger ally for them.

Indeed, Washington’s intention to interfere in Indonesian domestic matters was crystal clear. In total, the US government spent $10 million to back a revolution in Indonesia, with CIA pilots such as Allen Pope took off from Singapore (an emerging Cold War ally), with the goal of “destroying the government of Indonesia or breaking the country into little pieces.” The US also tried to infiltrate the Indonesian political scenes by funding a million dollars to Masjumi, an Islamic conservative party to the right of Sukarno. However, Sukarno and his supporters did well in the 1955 election, and worse for the US, the PKI (who are in the left of Sukarno) came in 4th place with 17% of the votes (their best performance to date). And so, Washington decided to take a different approach.

In the late 1950s and early 1960s Indonesia experienced a sudden hyper inflation, which was initiated by Indonesia’s compliance to IMF’s loan conditions in order to secure lending from them. As Bevins remarks, “[t]he IMF demanded what amounted to a structural adjustment program in Indonesia, which dictated spending cuts, an increase in the production of raw materials for export, currency devaluation, monetary tightening, and an end to government subsidies. Sukarno’s ministers went along with the IMF’s demands, and they had a swift, severe, and widespread impact on the population, which saw prices double, triple, or even quintuple overnight.”

And perhaps most significantly, the inflation was then exacerbated due to a sabotage by a certain figure named Suharto. As Bevins explains, “[a]ccording to Subandrio, his former foreign minister, Suharto intentionally engineered hyperinflation by working with businessmen to restrict the supply of basic goods like rice, sugar, and cooking oil. Suharto encouraged anticommunist student groups, often drawn from the same schools Benny had attended just years earlier, to protest those high prices. The US government was intentionally destabilizing the economy.”

When Sukarno figured out the root-cause of the hyperinflation, it prompted him to respond with his famous line of “go to hell with your [IMF] aid!” The many aids soon indeed dried up from the US, except their aid to Indonesian military that would become handy later on. Things got worse after the friendly US Ambassador to Indonesia, Howard Jones, was replaced and especially when US president John F. Kennedy (who was also friendly with Sukarno) was assassinated in November 1963 and his replacement Lyndon Johnson opted out from reconciliatory approach under the JFK administration.

It was within this hostile environment that the 30 September 1965 incident occurred in Jakarta. By then the three forces in the country were the PKI on the left (loosely influenced by the Soviet and China), nationalistic Sukarno in the middle, and the military and Muslim groups on the right (funded by the US), with the president would “use his personal influence to play rivals against each other, and maintain a delicate balance.” The PKI in particular now had 3 million card-carrying members, with the organizations affiliated with the party had at least 20 million members. At that point, the population of Indonesia was roughly 100 million (including children) therefore nearly a third of the country’s adult register voters were PKI affiliates. A grave concern for Washington.

But they had a plan, a big scenario, where “both the American and British governments had believed, and discussed often, that the ideal situation would be a “premature PKI coup” that could provoke an Army response. It’s possible that some version of this plan had been worked on secretly, under the cover of Kennedy’s civic action program, since 1962.” But the problem was, under D. N. Aidit, the PKI took the non-violent path, despite being advised by Mao Zedong to take up arm struggles when Sukarno fell ill in August 1965, in a fear of a right-wing attack towards the left if Sukarno dies. But as CIA themselves noted earlier in May 1965, the PKI had “only limited potential for armed insurgency and would almost certainly not wish to provoke the military into open opposition.” And thus provoking the PKI to stage a coup was out of the question.

So the alternative would be a CIA-funded military coup, since they’re already in Washington’s payroll anyway. But confusingly, Washington also told Indonesian top commander General Nasution that “he should wait patiently; even if Sukarno dies [head of the Armed Forces, General Nasution] should be flexible rather than start a coup. He accepted the suggestion from the Americans.” But still, as 1965 went on, “rumors that right wing generals were conspiring with the CIA or some foreign power began to spread like wildfire in Jakarta.”

And their suspicions intensified when Sukarno and many in the Indonesian government found out who was coming to Jakarta to replace US Ambassador Howard Jones. As Bevins remarks, “[n]ewly minted Ambassador Marshall Green, they learned, had been in Seoul when Park Chung Hee took power in a military coup that destroyed the short-lived parliamentary Second Republic.” And that suspicions did not take long to be proven right.

Until this day, what happened on 30 September 1965 remains blurry due to the unavailability of the hard evidence (still kept in secret), but to its credit this book made a very clear distinction between facts and speculations. And what’s factually accurate is as follows: “At some point, a group of midlevel Army officers formed a group and decided to call it the Gerakan 30 September (“G30S” or “September 30th Movement”) and came up with a plan.”

The leaders of the movement were Lieutenant Colonel Untung and Colonel Abdul Latief, and they genuinely believed that the military generals were about to conspire against Sukarno and stage a coup. Being Sukarno loyalists, they would take actions to prevent this from happening. How do they come up with that conclusion, what information were being fed to them, and by who? It’s still a well-guarded secret until today, and naturally not mentioned in the book.

But what did happen was these low ranking officers organized 7 teams that consist of soldiers already under their official military command. Each one of them would head to the homes of 7 of the highest-ranking officers in the Armed forces, arrest them, and bring them back to the Halim Air Force Base where they met before the operation.

But the plot went offrail real quick when 6 of the teams brought back their targets, allegedly tortured them, and assassinated them. The victims include the commander of the Army Lieutenant General Achmad Yani, Lieutenant General MT Haryono, Lieutenant General S. Parman, Mayor General DI Panjaitan, Mayor General Sutoyo Siswomiharjo, Lieutenant General Suprapto, but the most important target General Nasution escaped by jumping over the back wall of his house and hid in the home of his friend, the Iraqi ambassador. And instead, the team accidentally killed Nasution’s 5-year old daughter and brought back his military assistant Captain Pierre Tendean and assassinate him instead.

Another General that escaped the slaughter, rather conveniently, was Mayor General Suharto. The only General spared right from the start. He was the person who Washington used to exacerbates the hyperinflation, the person who Washington supported and funded after the coup, but notably there’s no official public evidence ever published that shows he’s directly involved in the coup (with “published” is the key word here).

However, if CIA didn’t orchestrate the coup, they surely made the most of it by grabbing power after the incident. As explained by Bevins, “[s]oon after the initial confusion, the US government assisted Suharto in the crucial early phase of spreading propaganda and establishing his anticommunist narrative. Washington quickly and covertly supplied vital mobile communications equipment to the military, a now-declassified October 14 cable indicates. This was also a tacit admission, very early, that the US government recognized the Army, not Sukarno, as the true leader of the country, even though Sukarno was still legally the president.” Hence, the many strong assumptions and speculations that the coup was backed by the CIA, due to the activities it conducted around the coup, although this book stopped short on labeling it as a CIA orchestrated coup.

And what was the US-assisted propaganda that Suharto was spreading? That it was not the conduct of a faction of the military that believed the Generals were about to betray Sukarno in a coup (something that Lieutenant Colonel Untung until his last dying breath swore that it is what he was doing, to save Sukarno and the country), but instead it was the PKI that staged the kidnapping, torturing, and killing of the generals (which fits with the ideal situation discussed by the US and Britain).

Subsequently, due to the false smear campaign towards PKI, there were a tsunami of rage and revenge towards the PKI and a mass slaughter then occurred for its members (most notably conducted by the youth faction of Nahdlatul Ulama – a right wing Muslim group). And astonishingly, it wasn’t only the US government officials who provided a kill lists to the Army. But “managers of US-owned plantations furnished them with the names of “troublesome” communists and union organizers, who were then murdered.” They also raided the houses of the Chinese embassy personnel.

In total, it is estimated that between 500,000 to 1,000,000 people were slaughtered, and 1,000,000 more were herded into concentration camps, which consist of Sukarno supporters and PKI members (including its affiliate organizations). And for the rest who got away? They mostly went underground and stayed silence. As Bevins remarks, “[t]heir silence was the point of the violence. The Armed Forces did not oversee the extermination of every single communist, alleged communist, and potential communist sympathizer in the country. That would have been nearly impossible, because around a quarter of the country was affiliated somehow with the PKI. Once the killings took hold, it became incredibly hard to find anyone who would admit to any association with the PKI.”

Bevins then added, “[e]very part of the story the Indonesian Army told is a lie. No Gerwani women participated in any killings on October 1. More than three decades later, Benedict Anderson was able to prove not only that the account of the torture of the generals was false, but that Suharto knew it was all false in early October. He himself ordered an autopsy that showed all the men were shot except one, who may have been stabbed with a bayonet in a fight at his home. But by 1987, when Anderson’s proof was published, not much of that discovery mattered anymore. The story of a demonic communist plot to take over the country by mutilating good, God-fearing military men in the dark of night had become something like part of the national religion under the Suharto dictatorship.”

Moreover, US officials made it very clear to the military that direct assistance could resume “if the PKI were destroyed, Sukarno was removed, and attacks on US investments halted. Aid flows were also conditional on Indonesia’s willingness to adopt IMF- and US-approved economic plans.”

And that’s exactly what Suharto did. “In his first acts [after taking over power from Sukarno], he officially banned what was left of the Communist Party, then arrested much of Sukarno’s cabinet, including Subandrio. The United States immediately opened the economic floodgates. The stranglehold on the economy was loosened, and US firms began exploring opportunities for profit. Within days of the transfer of power, representatives from the US mining company Freeport were in the jungles of West New Guinea, and quickly found a mountain filled with valuable minerals. Ertsberg, as it is now called, is the largest gold mine on the planet.”

Bevins then continues, “[i]n 1967, the first year of Suharto’s fully consolidated rule, General Electric, American Express, Caterpillar, and Goodyear Tire all came to explore the new opportunities available to them in Indonesia. Star-Kist foods arrived to see about fishing in Indonesian waters, and of course, defense contractors Raytheon and Lockheed popped over, too.” Moreover, they also set up a conference in Geneva titled “To Aid in the Rebuilding of a Nation”, and it was a huge success. “Under Secretary of State George Ball was there. New Foreign Minister Adam Malik, a longtime Washington favorite in Indonesia, gave a speech emphasizing the importance of the military as “the only credible political power in Indonesia.” And David Rockefeller made some very encouraging final remarks: “I have talked with a good many people over the course of the last couple days and I think I have found universal enthusiasm.”

Indonesia was back in business.

The sheer success of the coup (or taking advantage of the incident) inspired the US to implement the “Jakarta Method” into 22 more countries, most notably in Brazil, Guatemala, Chile, and Cambodia, which are covered extensively in the book.

The method has very specific objectives similar to what they did in Indonesia: to kill off the spread of communism, even those built through a democracy, as well as practically destroying any trace of the Third World Movement of non-alliance. And instead, the US actions in 1950s-1980s were to make the world submissive to its control, through IMF loan and its neo-liberalist conditions of austerity, liberalization and privatization, which open up “profitable markets” for corporations.

All in all, the book is a carefully written account of one of the darkest periods (if not THE darkest period) of Indonesian history, written based on “declassified information, the consensus formed by the most knowledgeable historians, and overwhelming first-person testimony.” And for the latter part, Bevins “visited twelve countries and interviewed over one hundred people, in Spanish, Portuguese, English, and Indonesian. [He also] pored through the archives in the same number of languages, spoke to historians around the world, and did work with research assistants in five countries.”

As a result, Bevins combined the explanation of the evidence-based context with a brilliant story telling using the vantage points of previously-unknown ordinary citizens like Sakono, Zain, Francisca, Ing Giok, Carmen, Agung, Benny, Sumiyati, Magdalena, Winarso, and many more people who represent many different demographic classes in Sukarno’s Indonesia, Guatemala, Brazil, etc.

The book also provides further background context for these individuals in chapter 11, which culminated nicely in chapter 12 where it shows where they are now. Not all of them have a happy ending, however, and the majority of them are now living in exile, such as the scores of people studying abroad sent by Sukarno and unable to come back home after the coup because they were forced to sign a form declaring allegiance to Suharto by their embassy, and those who refused to do so got their passport confiscated (thus making them stateless).

And for anyone wondering about the legality of the coup, Bevins reported that “[i]n addition to the crime of extermination, an International People’s Tribunal assembled later in the Netherlands found the Indonesian military guilty of a number of crimes against humanity, including torture, unjustified and long-term detainment in cruel conditions, forced labor amounting to enslavement, and systematic sexual violence. The judges found that all this was carried out for political purposes—to destroy the Communist Party and then “prop up a violent, dictatorial regime”—with the assistance of the United States, the UK, and Australia.”

The statement couldn’t be any clearer than this. But somehow, the verdict was hardly heard in Indonesia, if any. And instead, the narratives in Indonesian textbooks and media are still those that stigmatizing PKI, where being a communist is still the gravest and most taboo thing to be, and the PKI propaganda museum still exists today and hasn’t changed one single false narrative even 26 years since Suharto stepped down in 1998. I should know, because I visited it last month. As they say, they may changed the clothes but the regime stays the same.