A memoir of a sexual abuse victim

“Nobody’s Girl” by Virginia Roberts Giuffre

In a post on Twitter in December 2019, Virginia Giuffre stated that “I am making it publicly known that in no way, shape or form am I suicidal. I have made this known to my therapist and GP. If something happens to me – in the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me to protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quieted.”

This statement was made long after she became the most recognisable face among the victims in Jeffrey Epstein’s and Ghislaine Maxwell’s underage sex trafficking case. But crucially it was important to declare because on 5 October 2019 Dr. Daniel P. Greenwald, Epstein’s plastic surgeon, died of a weird plane crash; on 19 November 2019 Epstein’s private banker, Thomas Bowers, died by “an apparent suicide” before the FBI got the chance to question him; and these suspicious deaths happened after Jeffrey Epstein himself was reportedly died by suicide in jail on 10 August 2019.

But yet, 6 years later on 25 April 2025 Virginia herself was reportedly died by suicide, in her remote Australian farm, leaving behind her husband Robbie and 3 children (Alex, Tyler, Ellie). Who are these rich and powerful people that want to cover their trace?

Co-written with journalist Amy Wallace, this memoir is published posthumously and it gives Virginia the voice to speak even after she’s being silenced. It is a very difficult book to read, a sickening book, but a very important one in order to understand how diabolical sex predators work.

The book cleverly switches back and forth between her happy normal childhood, to her Epstein experience, back to her dark teenage years, and to her eventual family life in a quiet farm outside Perth, before spending the rest third of the book on the fight to bring Epstein and Maxwell to justice. It is deliberately structured as such in order to form a big picture narrative (rather than a linear narrative) of the puzzle peace of Virginia’s life before she tragically passed away.

It is a surprisingly very well written book that is gripping to read, but at the same time it is also very hard to read exactly due to the switching back and forth between her gruesome past and her wholesome family life before she died. Because as I gotten to know her more and more, with growing empathy on her wellbeing, all I can think of when reading about her quiet normal life now is that she already has a deserved happy life now, why risk it all by going after the most powerful people in the world?

Of course, the book later reveal that this was the plan after all, but just like any other things that were happening in her life, she got dragged into it and had no other choice but to fight on.

Virginia was spotted by Ghislaine Maxwell working as a 16-year-old locker room assistant at Mar-a-Lago in 2000, where she was then brought by Maxwell to Jeffrey Epstein’s house to be “interviewed” as a possible masseuse. Yup, it went exactly as you imagined it to be, she was forced to have sex with Epstein that day, and both that day and in subsequent assaults Maxwell also participated in a threesome. She eventually stuck with them for a little more than 2 and a half years.

Indeed, the immediate question that comes in mind is, why stuck with them and not run away? The answer to this went beyond Epstein, in another disturbing account of Virginia’s even darker and sadder past that was started since the age of 6, when she was molested by her father, who then “swap” her to a family friend to molest (fellow child molester uncle Forrest – whom disgust me when reading that uncle Forrest later was transformed into a man of God, and then had the audacity to tell Virginia to ask forgiveness to God for what she has done with her dad and him).

The childhood story and the wildly rebellious teenage story (as a response to her painful childhood) are so disturbing that at one point it clicked on me: Epstein’s and Maxwell’s treatment of her are angelic – with wellbeing, luxury living, and world travels – compared with the rest of these scums. That’s why she sticks with them longer than the other victims.

Moreover, also hard to read is her description of her happy childhood before the age of 6. The decently functioning family (with dad, mom, little baby brother, and an older step brother), nice neighbourhood, a loving grandma, family dinner every night, liking the Simpsons, living in a ranch, having a favourite teacher Mrs. McGirt, with Virginia love to wander around at the outdoor and even got a horse that she absolutely adored named Alice.

It was hard to read, because knowing what would happen to this innocent happy little girl not long after, when her dad began to molest her (and threatened to kill her baby brother – whom she love very much – if she ever tell a soul about this assault) and her mother almost immediately transformed from a loving caring mom into a jealous cold b*tch that growingly resort to alcoholism and abuse towards her, instead of protecting her. Maybe what makes it worse is, as we later found out in the book, her uncles and aunts knew about it and also didn’t do anything about it. As Virginia explains, “Young girls (and boys, too) don’t end up being sexually trafficked in a vacuum. Serial sexual abuse doesn’t happen to them—to us—out of the blue. In many cases, we are first abandoned by those who claim to love us.”

With this kind of environment at home, no wonder that she began to turn into a disturbed teenager full of anger with self-destructing tendencies. With Virginia recalls, “At ten years old, I saw my preadolescent body as an enemy. I couldn’t control how it drew the attention of the men who caused me pain, so I began to starve it.”

It is especially hard to read the abuses that she began to suffer at pre-teenage years, because she was exactly the same age as my daughter today, whom also love animals and love listening to music like Virginia did. My fatherly instinct prompted me to want to protect Virginia like my own daughter, and feeling utterly helpless as I read on to the next pages.

The teenage years

The angry teenage years were filled with so many runaways from home, picking fights everywhere she went, and eventually culminates in being accused of being “out of control” by her mother, and was then tricked by her mother to join a tough-love treatment centre called Growing Together, that resembles more of a prison, complete with a solitary confinement (where at one point she spent 3 weeks there – “which had no toilet, no mattress, only a cold concrete floor coated in the filth previous occupants had left behind”). As Virginia recalls, “In the name of healing, Growing Together’s staff forced kids between the ages of thirteen and seventeen to stand in front of the mirror and berate themselves at the top of their lungs. “I am a whore, a slut, a druggie,” we girls would yell, staring into our own eyes. We had no choice but to comply.” She was even got raped inside the facility by 2 boys (aged 17 and 18), with the perpetrators were protected and never punished.

Virginia then further recall, ““What goes on here, stays here,” staff would often say. The longer I spent at Growing Together, the more I understood why. Rules were rigid. Boys had to keep their heads shaved nearly bald. Girls, though, weren’t allowed to shave their legs or underarms. It was as if the staff wanted to mark us, to make us look as abnormal on the outside as they told us we were on the inside. Strip searches and pepper spray were the methods they used to keep us “in line.” The squalid building, meanwhile, was overrun with cockroaches and rats.”

She then eventually managed to run away from that hellhole. As Virginia remarks, “Those girls and boys, women and men, will likely attempt to flee between three and seven times before they succeed, according to recent research. Many of them will not be offered help by a single caring stranger. In America, where only 4 percent of law-enforcement agencies have personnel dedicated to exposing human trafficking, most victims must rely on their own wits, and on luck, to survive.” And so she learned to rely on herself.

But the unlucky streak didn’t stop there, almost immediately after she ran away, she was lured by a man in a white van to offer her a lift, but he ended up raping her in a dodgy motel. When she can somehow escape from that, she then met an “old man with a limousine” – Ron Eppinger – who claimed to own a modelling agency, who showered her with gifts but eventually made her as one of his concubines and trafficked her to a friend of his.

As Virginia recalls of her interaction with Eppinger, “That’s when he reaches for me and strokes my hair. “If you want,” Eppinger says, “I can be your new daddy.”” Virginia then reasoned, “Part of me feels a familiar dread. Is it too late to get away? But another, bigger part remembers how life was in rehab and in foster care and, worst of all, on the run. Maybe this is the way all men behave? I am tired. I want to feel nothing. The old man calls me “Baby.” I am the youngest girl there, so the nickname sort of fits. I want to become someone new so badly that I accept it. “Baby” is now who I am.”

Eppinger eventually held her captive for around 6 months. And during this time he growingly became more violent during sex, which prompted Virginia to resort to the drugs that Eppinger and the other girls offered her like Xanax or oxycodone, anything to numb the pain. She even began to fantasizing about killing herself.

After half a year, Eppinger began to give her away to his friend, a man in his fifties and had connections to Fort Lauderdale’s seedy nightclub scene, who began to introduce her to everyone as his girlfriend. “Maybe someone there noticed how young I looked and reported it,” Virginia recalls, “because on a bright June morning in 1999, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the local police broke down the door of the man’s apartment, where I was sleeping naked next to him.”

Afterwards, she had multiple brief encounters, including being sent back to Growing Together, before escaping again and staying at her parents’ house for few days (but they made it very clear that she wasn’t accepted there), moving to a friend’s house, ended up living together with a boy who works at Taco Bell, and as a high school dropout had several jobs that she loves like working in a pet store, before she eventually landed a job in Mar-a-Lago.

The Epstein years

It is no wonder that by the time she met Epstein she said “I had been sexualized against my will and had survived by acquiescing. I was a pleaser, even when pleasing others cost me dearly. For 10 years, men had cloaked their abuse of me in a fake mantle of ‘love.’ Epstein and Maxwell knew just how to tap into that same crooked vein.”

This is how Epstein and Maxwell lured Virginia, break down her defenses, and eventually control her: It began with Maxwell inviting Virginia to come to Epstein’s house to learn how to become a masseuse. With every doubt or shock when massaging him Maxwell will respond by downplaying it as an overreaction. As Virginia remarks, “Only later would I see how, step by practiced step, the two of them were breaking down my defenses. Every time I felt a twinge of discomfort, one glance at Maxwell told me I was overreacting. And so it went for about half an hour: a seemingly legitimate massage lesson.”

I’m not going to quote how the detailed account of the abuse went, but I will show you what Virginia was thinking afterwards: “Only after buckling my seat belt did I begin to return to myself. Having escaped from an imminent threat, my brain came back online, but all it wanted to do was scream. During the half-hour drive inland to Loxahatchee, Alessi [Epstein’s driver] and I didn’t speak. If I opened my mouth, I just knew I’d start sobbing, so I clamped my lips shut. I didn’t know then what a therapist would tell me a decade later: that when children are abused by people they love, as I had been by my father, they start to believe that love and pain, love and betrayal, love and violation all go together.”

Indeed, abuse victims often struggle to see red flags because they’ve become conditioned and familiarized to inappropriate behaviour. As Virginia further explained, “I didn’t know that a common coping mechanism during sexual abuse is to distance oneself from what is happening in the moment—to “split” into parts: the obedient body and the walled-off mind. All I knew as the black Suburban headed west was that I felt gutted, as if someone had reached down my throat and scraped out my insides with a silver spoon.”

So begins the period of her life that has since become world famous, for all the wrong reasons. In the book Virginia then reveals Epstein’s modus operandi: “So many young women, myself included, have been criticized for returning to Epstein’s lair even after we knew what he wanted from us. How can you complain about being abused, some have asked, when you could so easily have stayed away? If you didn’t like feeling dirty, you could simply have never gone back. But that stance wrongly discounts what many of us had been through before we encountered Epstein, as well as how good he was at spotting girls whose wounds made them vulnerable to him. Several of us had been molested or raped as children; many of us were poor or even homeless.”

Virginia then continues, “Before meeting Epstein, one of his victims had watched her father beat an eight-year-old boy to death; another was present when her boyfriend killed himself. We were girls who no one cared about, and Epstein pretended to care. At times I think he even believed he cared. A master manipulator who excelled at divining the desires of others, he threw what looked like a lifeline to girls who were drowning, girls who had nothing, girls who wished to be and do better. If they wanted to be dancers, he offered dance lessons. If they aspired to be actors, he said he’d help them get roles. If they said the only thing they yearned to do was paint, he bought them canvases and introduced them to key people in the art world. And then, he did his worst to them.”

And when it comes to Virginia personally, “For so many years, I had been sexualized against my will and had survived by acquiescing. Even as a girl on the precipice of womanhood, I was a pleaser, even when pleasing others cost me dearly. For ten years, men had cloaked their abuse of me in a fake mantle of “love.” Epstein and Maxwell knew just how to tap into that same crooked vein.”

And when this approach is wearing off, “Epstein must’ve sensed my qualms, though, because he walked around his desk, picked up a grainy photograph, and handed it to me. The image had been taken from some distance, but it was unmistakably my little brother. Skydy was walking away from the camera; I could see his backpack, and the outline of the side of his face. I felt a stab of fear. Why did Epstein have a photo of the person I loved most in the world? “We know where your brother goes to school,” Epstein said. He let that sink in for a moment, then got to the point: “You must never tell a soul what goes on in this house.” He was smiling, but his threat was clear: should I ever be tempted to betray him and go to the authorities, he would hurt Skydy. I stared at him. He stared back. “And I own the Palm Beach Police Department,” he said, “so they won’t do anything about it.””

Virginia whole ordeal lasted more than it should, during which she met numerous world famous personalities that she has saw with her own eyes, which I will categorized into two: 1. Direct predators 2. Name dropping that knew Epstein or worked together with Epstein and Maxwell but not necessarily an abuser (at least not from the stories written in this book):

  1. Direct predators: Prince Andrew, the French modeling agent Jean-Luc Brunel, Marvin Minsky, Bill Ricardson (the former governor of New Mexico), a well known Prime Minister who brutally rape her (whose name is not mentioned), a gubernatorial candidate who was soon to win election in a Western state (whose name she also didn’t mention), a former US senator, 3 billionaires, and many more men that she didn’t mention by name whom were “illustrious in their fields.” Note on those names that she didn’t mention, she was afraid that these rich and powerful men can go after her family or, as 1 billionaire had threatened to do, drown her in never ending court cases that it will bankrupt her.
  2. Name dropping: Donald and Melania Trump, Leslie Wexner, Heidi Klum (hosting a party), Ian Schrager, Bill Clinton, Al and Tipper Gore, Bill Gates, James “Jes” Staley (CEO of Barclays Bank), Leon Black (CEO and cofounder of private equity firm Apollo Global Management), Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, George Clooney, Stephen Hawking, Simpsons creator Matthew Groening (only hitched a ride with them on Epstein jet, although Epstein asked Virginia to massage Groening’s feet), Nadia Marcinkova, Chris Tucker, Kevin Spacey, Naomi Campbell, a photograph Epstein took with the Dalai Lama and members of the British royal family.

Furthermore, Virginia also explains the dynamism of the relationship between Epstein and Maxwell: “I gathered that she’d met Epstein not long before her father passed, and I suspected that had something to do with their connection. And what was that connection like? While they usually slept in separate bedrooms, and rarely kissed or held hands, it seemed to me that Maxwell and Epstein lived in complete symbiosis. Epstein, who described Maxwell as his best friend, valued her knack for connecting him to powerful people. Maxwell, in turn, appreciated that Epstein had the resources to fund the lavish life she thought she deserved yet had trouble affording after her father’s death. In social settings, Maxwell often appeared vivacious, entertaining, the life of the party. But in Epstein’s household, she functioned more as a party planner: scheduling and organizing the endless parade of girls who she and others—particularly Sarah Kellen—recruited to have sex with him.” Virginia then concluded that “Over time, I would come to see Epstein and Maxwell less as boyfriend and girlfriend, and more as two halves of a wicked whole.”

But still, in their daily routine Epstein and Maxwell behaved like actual parents to her, something that she didn’t get since the age of 6. As Virginia recalls, “The first time we ate a meal together, for example, they were appalled by my table manners. So Maxwell taught me how to hold a knife and fork, just so, and to fold my napkin in my lap, the way civilized people do. Soon, she’d be telling me how to do my makeup, how to dress, and where to get my hair cut (the celebrity stylist Frédéric Fekkai groomed many of the girls in Epstein’s world, including me). Even then, part of me knew she was having her dentists whiten my teeth, or sending me to a waxer to remove my body hair, to please Epstein.”

And they also did show genuine affections towards her: “But the role Maxwell played in my life sometimes felt like more than that. One day in the fall of 2000, we heard “Yellow,” Coldplay’s new love song, on the car radio. I loved it and couldn’t get the tune out of my head. A day later, Maxwell presented me with the CD as a gift. She also gave me my first cell phone. Of course, it served her to have me on a short tether, for her and Epstein’s use. But the gift also felt vaguely protective. I was no expert on mothers, but in those early days, I sometimes imagined Maxwell as mine.”

This view was reiterated many pages later when Virginia said, “This is complicated to explain, but that echo of past hurts was somehow bearable to me because I’d felt it—and somehow endured it—so many times before. It was like finding myself once more in a room I’d lived in for years. I hated that room, but I knew its contours—the shape of its windows, the nap of its carpet beneath my feet, the click of the door lock when it was thrown. I knew I could exist in that room because I’d existed there before. At that point, at least, this made me feel less afraid.” Moreover, “Returning from trips to service other men, I’d be greeted not only with money but with something I wanted more. “We’re proud of you,” Epstein would say, and despite my shame and embarrassment, I’d feel something I thought was contentment. That knot of contradictory feelings would take me years to untangle.”

This whole thing made Virginia realized that “Today, I can see how this, too, was an echo from my childhood. I hated the sexual duties that Epstein and Maxwell required of me, but I bargained with myself, just as I had when my father abused me: “Just get the icky part over with so the good parts of life can go on.””

Indeed, the classic technique of abuse: love bombing after the assault, that create a Stockholm Syndrome.

Only this time, it appears that Epstein also enjoyed her company: “Now he began asking me to tuck him into his pink satin sheets each night. While “tuck him in” might sound like a euphemism for sex, it didn’t always mean that to Epstein. Though my job during the day was to arouse and satisfy him sexually, at night he mostly wanted to be soothed—and then left alone. He liked me to reach under the covers to massage his feet and maybe then his scalp. Only after he fell asleep was I permitted to pull the covers up to his chin and quietly exit his room. I am the only one I know of who was asked to do this for him, and at the time he told me that signified that I was “Number One” among the many girls and servants who attended to him. That designation gave me a proud feeling.”

And this is what makes her, years later, a very important witness for the Epstein case. As Virginia remarks, “It wasn’t until we returned to Florida that I realized the bedtime rituals I’d been performing for Epstein had unlocked something in him. Suddenly he was confiding in me. One day we were in the massage room in Palm Beach when he showed me a hidden doorway next to some paintings of naked people stretching. I’d been in that room dozens of times by then but had never noticed a door there. Opening it, Epstein revealed what can only be described as a trophy closet. On the walls, from floor to ceiling, he’d tacked up hundreds of photos of young girls. All of the girls were naked, many of them quite obviously underage, and the images were raunchy, not demure. A stack of shoeboxes in the corner held the overflow. He had so many photos that he’d run out of display space. I turned to him, speechless. He didn’t speak either, but the smug look on his face said, “Look at my conquests. Look at how powerful I am.””

Also equally important, Maxwell also began to trust her and started to assign her to a new job: recruiting girls for Epstein. As Virginia recalls, “I’d already been told his criteria: recruits were preferably white, with wholesome, “girl next door” looks that made them appear between twelve and seventeen years old. No piercings, no tattoos, and definitely no call girls. But his key requirement, other than looks, was vulnerability. Recruits had to be enough “on the edge,” as Epstein and Maxwell put it, that they would submit to sex in exchange for money.”

Virginia then continues, “Maxwell, particularly, was amazing at sussing out what a particular girl might want or need, and she tailored her pitch for maximum appeal. After a girl visited Epstein for the first time, she’d be told she could make double the money if she brought a friend along next time. The incentive to lure another girl into the web was twofold: not only would the procurer make $400 (instead of the $200 she’d been paid the first time), but she’d usually avoid having to service Epstein herself, since the new girl would satisfy him.”

But what’s with his obsession with young girls? Virginia actually gave the reasoning when she explains, “Epstein liked to share with me what he insisted were “scientific” justifications for his yearnings for young girls. For example, he would only have sex with girls who had started menstruating. Why? So he could assert that—since they were biologically able to bear children—they were “of age.” I was flabbergasted when he said this stuff, but I held my tongue. No matter how young a girl looked, or how sexually inexperienced she was, if she had her period, he felt he could defend his abuse of her as part of the natural order of things.”

Moreover, “The fact that different nations and states define the age of consent differently (in Florida it’s eighteen; in New York it’s seventeen; in England it’s sixteen) only gave him ammunition. He said these inconsistencies proved these laws were arbitrary and meaningless; no one could convince him that sex with minors was wrong, because no one could agree on what a minor was!”

Was the lust of young women the only reason why Epstein and Maxwell did this? Virginia didn’t think so. As she remarks, “Once Maxwell and Epstein had started trafficking me to strange men, I often wondered what they stood to gain. One theory is that they trafficked girls to some of their powerful acquaintances in the hope of being owed future favors. My impression of many of these men is that they didn’t know how to pursue women. Awkward and socially immature, it was as if their big brains were missing the ability to interact with other people. By giving them obedient girls, Epstein eliminated their need to persuade or entice potential sexual partners, and they were grateful for it. Another theory—which is supported by the fact that Epstein’s houses were all outfitted with video cameras in every room—is that he wanted to record men in compromising positions in order to blackmail them later. I don’t know if that is true, but I do know that Epstein kept a huge library of videotapes that had been recorded inside his houses. In the Manhattan townhouse, Epstein himself showed me the room in which he monitored and recorded the camera feeds.”

But still, the sexual assault, even rape, not to mention the guilty conscience of luring other young girls into the Epstein trap eventually take their toll on her, with he body started to resist the stress from them and she became very ill. Afterwards, she began to plan her escape, by agreeing to be a surrogate to Epstein and Maxwell’s baby (a long, sick, story) but only with a condition that they teach her how to be a masseurs properly. To her surprise, Epstein and Maxwell then send her to Chiang Mai, Thailand, to learn about Thai massage. And that’s where she met Robert Giuffre.

As Virginia recalls, “Then, just after my nineteenth birthday, I met someone who seemed to give a damn about me. I took a chance, and in 2002 I escaped.”

Life after Epstein

Robert Giuffre is a breath of fresh air in a damp and dark place of Virginia’s past, as they instantly hit it off and even got married in less than 2 weeks since they met.

As Virginia recalls, “Robbie asked more questions about Epstein and Maxwell. How often did they check in on me? How soon was I expected to return to the United States? I remember I was crying as I told him I wasn’t sure how I could ever break free from Epstein and Maxwell’s web. But Robbie shook his head. “You don’t have to live that way,” he said, taking my hand. “Come back to Australia with me.” A week into knowing each other, he dropped down onto one knee and proposed. “You won’t be rich,” Robbie told me, “but I will work hard to support you. I’ll never hurt you. Never betray you. I’ll be here for you and always love you. I’ll have your back until we die.” I’d never thought I’d hear those words from anyone, and as I told him yes, happy tears ran down my cheeks. “I love you, too,” I said.”

It is so nice to read how Robbie is treating her for a change, and how his family also embraced and love her fully, everything that she never had since 6 years old.

Like the story how Robbie’s dad took care of her when she was ill: “A few days after our return, I fell terribly ill with some sort of flu. When I spiked a fever, Robbie was at work—he’d gotten a construction job. I felt awful: clammy and hot. I didn’t want to be a pain in anyone’s ass, and—especially since I’d just learned the Aussie phrase “having a whinge” (complaining for no reason)—I was determined to be stoic. But when Robbie’s dad discovered how sick I was, he swung into action, whipping up his special zuppa di lenticchie, or lentil soup. I was too weak to get out of bed, but Frank propped me up on my pillows and then sat beside me, feeding me spoonfuls until I was full. Later, as I passed in and out of a sweaty, delirious sleep, he returned every few minutes to cool my forehead with a damp cloth. When my fever broke, Frank brought me coffee that was creamy from the raw egg he’d stirred into it. After I’d recovered, Frank sat with me and showed me how to peel a prickly pear, teaching me to avoid the nettles, which will embed themselves like fiberglass in your fingers if you aren’t careful. He didn’t say much, just as Robbie had warned that he wouldn’t, but in those first weeks that I was in Sydney, Frank gave me more nurturing than I ever got from my own father.”

Or how Robbie’s mum and aunties accept her: “The women of the Giuffre clan were more skeptical of me. Robbie’s mom, especially, is blunt and quick to call out wrongdoing, and at first she was suspicious of this skinny American who’d crash-landed on her doorstep. Then, just before Christmas, Nina took me to the home of some of Robbie’s aunties, or zias. It was cannoli-making day, and I was being drafted to help. I knew nothing about making cannoli, of course, but I quickly figured out the assembly line: pounding out the dough, then rolling it thin and wrapping it around bamboo poles that we dipped into a fryer, taking care not to burn them. Then we stuffed the crispy shells with three kinds of fillings: ricotta, vanilla cream, and chocolate. We must’ve made three hundred cannoli that day, and when I returned home, I had ricotta in my hair. But I’d passed some sort of test. The zias were proud of me.”

But of course it was never going to be easy, with past traumas often reappear in a form of dream and paranoia. That is, until one afternoon in 2007, 5 years since she escaped in Thailand, when her 1st child was sleeping and she was 8 months pregnant, the phone rang and she picked it up only to hear Maxwell’s sound at the other end of the line. And few days later Epstein himself called Virginia.

The Epstein case

2 years prior to this phone call, on 14 March 2005 a stepmother of a 14 year-old girl contacted the Palm Beach Police Department and reported that her child had been molested by a wealthy Palm Beach resident. “The concerned woman told police she’d learned about the incident from another mother who overheard the girl tell a friend that a forty-five-year-old man had paid her to have sex with him.” As Virginia recalls, years later when reading the police report she identified all of the similar modus operandi implemented by Epstein and Maxwell.

And thus the police initiated an investigation and surveillance on Epstein, where over the next 13 months they managed to track down more than 30 victims and interviewed them. This led to 20 October 2005, when the police execute a search warrant on Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion, but the police noted that “it appeared Epstein knew they were coming – it seemed computers had been removed from desks.” But still, the police managed to seize the photographs of naked young girls, as well as incriminating message pad, and many other evidence from lubricants to hidden cameras.

But then the investigation met by an intimidation campaign and interference, with Epstein eventually being charged in July 2006 on only 2 state felony charges: procuring a minor for prostitution, and solicitation of prostitute. And then he was allowed to post a $3000 bond and go home. Meanwhile, “the state attorney, Barry Krischer, finally convened a Palm Beach County grand jury, but presented evidence from just two victims”, with the grand jury charged him with a single charge of felony solicitation of prostitution, where Epstein then pleaded not guilty in August 2006.

This would be the major theme of the next decade or so of Virginia’s life, where she juggle between family life and trying to bring down the most powerful people on Earth, where they (meaning Virginia and her lawyers) often met with corrupt judges, defamatory, backstabbing, media framing (which only embolden my judgement that the Daily Mail is an utterly trashy media), injustices where Epstein and Maxwell can get away with court date or slapped only with light sentences with small bail money, etc.

The long saga also took its toll on the family, where several times they were surveilled, followed by paparazzi, had pictures of her children taken, and even approached by mysterious men snooping at their house or monitoring from a distance (which prompted them to move houses a few times, from several places in Australia, to several places in the US, and back to Australia again), having difficulties to seek employments (because “no one wants to hire a sex slaves”), even growingly distant to her husband and children due to the demand of the law suits. That were the real human costs that often brushed away from the reporting in the media.

But then, on 6 July 2019, 14 years later, Jeffrey Epstein was finally arrested on federal charges related to sex trafficking. He was apprehended after his private jet touched down at New Jersey’s Teterboro Airport, while at the same time his New York town house was raided and the police found an “extraordinary volume” of nude photographs of young-looking women. They also found a safe containing $70,000 in cash, 48 loose diamonds, and 3 passports belonging to Epstein: United States, Israel (an important subject for another time), and an expired passport from Austria that included a fake name and listed a home address in Saudi Arabia (a getaway plan).

Ghislaine Maxwell was not off the hook. On 9 August 2019 a judge made public for the first time of what would be several batches of previously sealed documents in Virginia’s defamation case against Maxwell. But before anything happened on Maxwell, the day after on 10 August 2019, Epstein reportedly committed suicide.

And it was indeed fishy. As Virginia remarks, “As the details came out, nearly everything about Epstein’s death seemed fishy. Even Attorney General William Barr would acknowledge he initially had suspicions that Epstein had been murdered. Instead, he concluded otherwise: that Epstein’s death was a result of “a perfect storm of screw-ups.” There was the fact that Epstein had tried to harm himself before but then been taken off suicide watch. While he’d had a cellmate at some point, on the night of his death, he did not have one. Two prison guards who sat at a desk just fifteen feet from Epstein’s cell were supposed to check on him every half hour from 10:30 p.m. to 6:30 a.m. Instead, they’d napped and browsed the internet, then falsified the logs to say they’d completed their rounds. Security cameras that could have captured Epstein’s self-harming behavior—or, if conspiracy theorists are to be believed, the actions of whoever murdered him—were not functioning. Other cameras that were working showed that no one had entered the area where Epstein was housed on the night he died—so that seemed to rule out the possibility of an assassin sneaking in. But then his brother hired a forensic pathologist to examine the official autopsy report. That expert concluded that the broken bones and cartilage in Epstein’s neck “point[ed] to homicide.””

So, was he killed or did he really commit a suicide? “I’ll tell you one thing, though”, Virginia remarks, “while I’ve read that Epstein was buried in an unmarked grave not far from his parents, in Palm Beach, Florida, I don’t believe that at all. Epstein had repeatedly told me exactly what would happen when he died: his body would be placed in some sort of cryogenic chamber to be preserved until technology advanced far enough to bring him back to life. That’s what he’d always bragged to me, with that satisfied smirk on his face. I know it sounds far-fetched, but I wouldn’t bet against the notion that he somehow got his way on this.”

Furthermore, “Investigators would soon discover that on August 8, two days before his death, Epstein had placed his entire fortune into a trust—“The 1953 Trust,” apparently named for his birth year—in the Virgin Islands. This legal maneuver would be widely interpreted as Epstein’s final thumbing of his nose at those who’d survived his predation, because it made it much more difficult for his victims to get restitution. Even after death, Epstein seemed to be asserting control.”

This got me thinking, was he really dead? Because look at the timeline: on 8 August Epstein moved his entire fortune to a trust. 10 August he committed suicide. And if you recall earlier on 5 October Epstein’s plastic surgeon had a plane crash (with details suggest a murder). And on 19 November his private banker committed suicide. Should we be looking for him in Austria, with a different face?

For the time being, it doesn’t matter. Because 3 days after Epstein’s death, on 13 August 2019 the New York Post published a photograph of Naomi Campbell’s 31st birthday party in a yacht in St Tropez, where Epstein attended. And most importantly in the photo there was Virginia and a glimpse of Maxwell’s hair, with the caption “Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘Sex Slave’ seen at Naomi Campbell’s birthday party in 2001.” And that’s how they eventually get Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years in jail in 2022.

And later, after unsuccessful previous attempts to bring Prince Andrew to court, on 12 January 2022 Virginia’s case against Prince Andrew finally got a green light, during the wave of the #MeToo movement. And Prince Andrew’s lawyers moved quickly to settle. As Virginia recalls, “On February 15, the settlement was announced. We issued a joint statement that made clear Prince Andrew would pay me money, though the amount was kept confidential (later it was reported that his mother, the queen of England, had footed the bill). The statement said he would also make a “substantial donation” in support of victims’ rights to my nascent nonprofit organization.”

And equally important for Virginia, Prince Andrew agreed to release an apology (well, sort of): ““Prince Andrew has never intended to malign Ms. Giuffre’s character,” the statement read in part, “and he accepts that she has suffered both as an established victim of abuse and as a result of unfair public attacks.” Yes, indeed, including attacks from the prince’s own camp! “It is known that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked countless young girls over many years,” the statement continued, acknowledging vastly more about Epstein’s predatory behavior than the prince himself had in his fateful BBC interview. “Prince Andrew regrets his association with Epstein, and commends the bravery of Ms. Giuffre and other survivors in standing up for themselves and others. He pledges to demonstrate his regret for his association with Epstein by supporting the fight against the evils of sex trafficking, and by supporting its victims.””

Nobody’s girl

If you think this story has a happy ending, sadly you are mistaken.

First, Virginia began to have a health problem, which innocently enough started during a family break when she got infected with a meningitis. As she recalls, “Butterfly Valley lived up to its name: we must’ve seen thousands of Cairns birdwings in all shapes, sizes, and colors. But when I returned home, I spiked a temperature and my head hurt like hell. When I became delirious, Robbie took me to the doctor, who did some tests and concluded I must’ve been bitten by a mosquito, because I had meningitis. I couldn’t believe it: during the trip, I’d been the only one in our group slathering myself with bug spray.”

And then things got worse, “I was admitted to the hospital, where things got so much worse. Not realizing how delirious I’d become, at one point I got out of bed to go to the toilet and lost my footing. When I fell to the floor, I heard a cracking sound. I’d broken my neck.” Moreover, “In August 2020, I had what’s called an anterior cervical discectomy; doctors at Sunnybank Private Hospital in Brisbane went in through the front of my throat and removed a shattered disk, then attached metal swivels in my neck to allow me to continue to have some mobility.”

But things just spiraling down afterwards, as Virginia recalls, “In February 2021, my health worsened. First, I developed a high fever, then a place on my thigh where I’d received a steroid injection became inflamed. My doctors speculated that maybe I was having an allergic reaction to the antibiotic I’d been taking after my neck surgery, but mostly they seemed stumped. Soon my inflamed thigh turned into a staph infection that refused to heal. Then, I got another case of pneumonia. It was as if my immune system was overloaded. I couldn’t catch a break.”

And again, “I’d been in the hospital again, having laparoscopic surgery to remove cysts from my ovaries and polyps from my uterus. For weeks leading up to that operation, I’d been bleeding nonstop. Doctors wondered whether my string of health problems were somehow related to the staph infection on my thigh, which was still not fully healed. No one was quite sure of anything, it seemed, except that my body seemed to be staging a revolt.”

If you notice the timeline (2020-2021) she’s having the health problems at the same time the legal battles took place. All of this court hearings, and all the media scrutiny, not to mention many harassments, on top of the health problems, were beginning to take its toll on Virginia. In particular, the constant focus on her deeply painful past, which she has to relive over and over again, eventually got to her and triggered a PTSD.

As Virginia recalls, “So when my trauma tricked my brain into telling me lies, I listened: “It would be better for everyone if you weren’t here,” my brain said. “You bring nothing but stress and worry into your husband and children’s lives. Why should they suffer because Jeffrey and Ghislaine caused you pain? You have let your family down. They deserve better. They will be happier without you.” My trauma took aim at my very existence: “Aren’t you exhausted? Unconsciousness would be a relief. Robbie and the kids are safe at home, so none of them will find you. It won’t hurt a bit. The pills are on the bedside table. It will be easy. You can just quietly slip away.” I believed my brain, so I reached for the painkillers that I had smuggled into the hospital and I swallowed as many as I could—later they’d estimate 240 pills—before I passed out. I’m told that I was revived with Narcan, the opioid overdose treatment. My fragile self-worth had imploded. All that remained were the shards of me.”

Luckily she survived, but just days later, “after I got out of the hospital, I would try to kill myself again, with more pills. It was only because our son Alex came to check on me that I did not succeed. For a second time, I woke up in the hospital, revived once more by Narcan. After that, it would be a long time before my thoughts of self-annihilation would truly begin to subside. Only then could I promise my husband and kids that I would try with all my might to believe that I mattered.”

Virginia later reasoned, “That is the price of serious trauma: it lays you low, and sometimes makes you your own worst enemy. My goal now is to prevent the emotional time bomb that lives inside me—my toxic memories and devastating visualizations of myself being hurt—from ever detonating again.”

But sadly, she eventually lost that battle.

Which makes me think, her eventual death from a reported suicide was perhaps legitimate after all? Because she reportedly passed away due to suicide – when she was alone in her ranch outside Perth – one month after she was involved in a car accident with a school bus that led to another period of hospitalization after she had a kidney failure.

And at the time of her death on 25 April 2025 Virginia was shockingly in the middle of divorce proceeding with Robbie, after splitting in 2023-2024, and after also becoming estranged with their 3 children, even got a restraining order in which Virginia expressed on Instagram that her children have been “poisoned with lies.” What happened here? An allegation of domestic abuse by Robbie was also reported by few media, where he said to become increasingly controlling and violent, although judging from the way Virginia portray him in this book, how could he? Nothing about this makes sense, after reading how their family was like.

But then again, we’ll never know what actually happened. Was she still being targeted by rich and powerful people in this ongoing battle to release the Epstein Files and to hold these names accountable, or were all of this just genuinely too much to handle in the end for Virginia?

Everyone’s an idiot and all correct predictions are just sheer dumb luck

“The Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable” by Nassim Nicholas Taleb

This is not a book about how to spot a Black Swan event, but rather a book that is trying to prove that we’re all helpless in the face of a Black Swan event.

The concept of Black Swan comes from the discovery of a literal black-coloured swan in Australia, that destroyed the common believe among ornithologists that all swans are white. Before this discovery even the empirical evidence were all pointed to swans being only white, which, according to the author, Nassim Nicholas Taleb, “illustrates a severe limitation to our learning from observations or experience and the fragility of our knowledge.”

He then continues, “One single observation can invalidate a general statement derived from millennia of confirmatory sightings of millions of white swans. All you need is one single (and, I am told, quite ugly) black bird.”

This is the core premise of the book, the highly unexpected occasion when our widely held perceptions are destroyed into pieces in an instance, and we have to bear the consequences of the risk associated with it. The book covers Black Swans in many different areas of life, including psychology, business, finance, and natural science, among others; analysing limitations, how humans deal with knowledge, when smart people are dumb, even the unpredictability of war.

Taleb (or what he likes to refer himself to as NNT, even use NNT to talk about himself in a third person’s point of view, which was weird) expands this thesis by categorising events into 2 camps: Mediocristan vs. Extremistan.

Mediocristan is an utopian province where particular events do not contribute much individually, but only collectively. The idea behind it is “when your sample is large, no single instance will significantly change the aggregate or the total. The largest observation will remain impressive, but eventually insignificant, to the sum.” Weight, height, and calorie consumption are from Mediocristan, so do income for a baker, a small restaurant owner, an orthodontist, a prostitute, or random statistics such as gambling profits, mortality rate, IQ, or car accidents. “Mediocristan”, as NNT remarks, “is where we must endure the tyranny of the collective, the routine, the obvious, and the predicted.”

Meanwhile, Extremistan is a place where inequalities are such that one single observation can highly impact the aggregate or the total. Almost all social matters are from Extremistan, such as wealth, income, name recognition as a celebrity, book sales per author, book citation per author, number of references on Google, populations of cities, number of speakers per language, uses of words in a vocabulary, damages caused by earthquakes, sizes of planets, sizes of companies, stock ownership, height between species, financial markets, commodity prices, inflation rates, economic data, deaths in war, deaths from terrorist incidents, and so much more.

Interestingly, before the advances of modern technology wars used to belong to Mediocristan, as it can only occur locally and it is quite difficult to kill so many people at once. But today, with weapons of mass destructions, all it takes is a button, a crazy person, or a small error to wipe out a population. As NNT remarks, “Extremistan is where we are subjected to the tyranny of the singular, the accidental, the unseen, and the unpredicted.” This is where Black Swans live.

Moreover, NNT also introduce the concept of the turkey problem. As he explains, “Consider a turkey that is fed every day. Every single feeding will firm up the bird’s belief that it is the general rule of life to be fed every day by friendly members of the human race “looking out for its best interests,” as a politician would say. On the afternoon of the Wednesday before Thanksgiving, something unexpected will happen to the turkey [getting slaughtered]. It will incur a revision of belief.”

Indeed, this is another core argument of the book, that we’re all living life like the turkey, being conditioned to the daily routine under the illusion that everything is normal and becoming oblivion to the huge risks that are facing us.

The book also teaches us to see the other side of the coin, to be a successful turkey – so to speak – where our victories or achievements are actually the result of dumb luck or a streak or dumb lucks that cannot be replicated anymore even with huge efforts (AKA, positive Black Swan). And after about 30% of the book, after all the important theories have been discussed, that’s all that NNT is talking about, the stupidity of people.

In what becomes a tiringly repetitive and bulky rants, he then proceeded to provide “examples” when experts from many different fields are wrong. For instance, he is mocking those who predicted a landslide win of Al Gore against George W. Bush (but Gore did win the popular vote by a landslide, but then Bush + Fox cheat through the electoral college recount in Florida – ironically THIS will be a Black Swan moment, one that NNT failed to address and instead blame it on the economic failures of the Clinton-Gore era).

He also mocks the bell curve as an intellectual fraud, and dedicate one whole chapter 15 about it. He insulted Nobel Prize winners in economics Harry Markowitz and William Sharpe for creating the Modern Portfolio Theory (which he called phony), insulted another Nobel Prize winners in economics pair of Myron Scholes and Robert C. Merton, he even mocks Plato for creating the “Platonic fold” to understand reality (and use “Platonic” word as a derogatory term throughout the book), while also disagreeing with [the followers of] Karl Marx and Adam Smith.

Meanwhile, throughout the book he also tries so hard to portray himself as an intellectual, by inserting stories about him being invited to multiple intellectual gatherings, which reminds me of the behaviour of the Sophist in Ancient Greek, that would do anything they can to appear sophisticated by any means necessary other than their actual intellectual arguments.

Because what is his intellectual argument, really? His basic premise is all experts whether it’s scientists, economists, bankers, investors, are all successful not because of their skills, but down to luck. Except for him and his favourite philosophers (of course). He even use Orwell’s 1984 as a failed prediction over the future (who’s going to tell him?).

Surely not all experts or all predictions are just dumb luck? There are patterns, early signs, and experts that can predict a Black Swan before it happened. Like Paul Tudor Jones famously predicted the Black Monday 1987 crash during the weekend, highlighting a pure competency. Or those traders who placed a huge sums of put options starting from 5 September 2001 all the way to 10 September 2001, before 9/11 occurred, highlighting insider information that were not readily available to the rest of the world.

To be fair, NNT did somewhat address this, in what he call a reverse turkey move: “From the standpoint of the turkey, the nonfeeding of the one thousand and first day is a Black Swan. For the butcher, it is not, since its occurrence is not unexpected. So you can see here that the Black Swan is a sucker’s problem. In other words, it occurs relative to your expectation. You realize that you can eliminate a Black Swan by science (if you’re able), or by keeping an open mind.”

But still, rather than teaching us how to spot a Black Swan event early (maybe by diving deeper into those who did predict the 1987 crash or who were in the know of 9/11 beforehand), he dedicate the entire book to ridicule experts for being unaware of Black Swan events and unable to cope with them.

Ironically, he himself said in the book that when pressed by the press to provide examples of the upcoming Black Swans, he couldn’t answer it. He even tell the story when one time a business was trying to hire him to be a forecaster of events, but he said he doesn’t do forecasting, in which the business promptly dropped him (and he mocks them for being closed minded when it comes to predictions). Oh the huge ego on this fragile diva.

NNT’s thesis reminds me of the Efficient Market Hypothesis, which argues that asset prices always reflect all available information, making it hard to achieve return in excess of the market’s average. It is an utopian view of the market, a good benchmark but not a realistic view in the real life where in reality human behaviour matters more in the ever inefficient market that can produce higher returns for those who understand market psychology.

Likewise, in his thesis NNT failed to highlight those who have inside information, the perpetrator, or even the early receiver of the information, – AKA all the reverse turkeys – over the upcoming Black Swan. This makes him similar like the Efficient Market Hypothesis hardliners that refuse to budge, even during the market meltdown in 2008 that was not supposed to happen in an efficient market.

Which is a bit of an anti-climax for the book. Because NNT doesn’t provide any way to spot a Black Swan, and instead only encourages us to adopt a mindset that accepts the randomness of reality, get comfortable in uncertainty, and prepare for the unexpected. Because by doing so, we get to minimize the impact of any Black Swans. In this regard, just like the Efficient Market Hypothesis supporters, he really is a Black Swan purist that is unwilling to compromise his utopian thesis.

But still, what can we learn from a person we grow to disagree? When we strip away the ego and the intellectual douchebaggery, quite a lot, actually. Here are some of the better insights from him, on the fascinating world of randomness:

  1. The dynamics of the Lebanese conflict had been patently unpredictable, yet people’s reasoning as they examined the events showed a constant: almost all those who cared seemed convinced that they understood what was going on. Every single day brought occurrences that lay completely outside their forecast, but they could not figure out that they had not forecast them. Much of what took place would have been deemed completely crazy with respect to the past. Yet it did not seem that crazy after the events.
  2. I repeat that we are explanation-seeking animals who tend to think that everything has an identifiable cause and grab the most apparent one as the explanation. Yet there may not be a visible “because”; to the contrary, frequently there is nothing, not even a spectrum of possible explanations. But silent evidence masks this fact.
  3. Mistaking a naïve observation of the past as something definitive or representative of the future is the one and only cause of our inability to understand the Black Swan.
  4. Matters should be seen on some relative, not absolute, timescale: earthquakes last minutes, 9/11 lasted hours, but historical changes and technological implementations are Black Swans that can take decades. In general, positive Black Swans take time to show their effect while negative ones happen very quickly—it is much easier and much faster to destroy than to build.
  5. We have a natural tendency to look for instances that confirm our story and our vision of the world—these instances are always easy to find. Alas, with tools, and fools, anything can be easy to find. You take past instances that corroborate your theories and you treat them as evidence. For instance, a diplomat will show you his “accomplishments,” not what he failed to do. Mathematicians will try to convince you that their science is useful to society by pointing out instances where it proved helpful, not those where it was a waste of time, or, worse, those numerous mathematical applications that inflicted a severe cost on society owing to the highly unempirical nature of elegant mathematical theories.
  6. The fallacy is associated with our vulnerability to overinterpretation and our predilection for compact stories over raw truths. It severely distorts our mental representation of the world; it is particularly acute when it comes to the rare event.
  7. We, members of the human variety of primates, have a hunger for rules because we need to reduce the dimension of matters so they can get into our heads. Or, rather, sadly, so we can squeeze them into our heads.
  8. The more random information is, the greater the dimensionality, and thus the more difficult to summarize. The more you summarize, the more order you put in, the less randomness. Hence the same condition that makes us simplify pushes us to think that the world is less random than it actually is. And the Black Swan is what we leave out of simplification.
  9. Think of the world around you, laden with trillions of details. Try to describe it and you will find yourself tempted to weave a thread into what you are saying. A novel, a story, a myth, or a tale, all have the same function: they spare us from the complexity of the world and shield us from its randomness. Myths impart order to the disorder of human perception and the perceived “chaos of human experience.”
  10. People in professions with high randomness (such as in the markets) can suffer more than their share of the toxic effect of look-back stings: I should have sold my portfolio at the top; I could have bought that stock years ago for pennies and I would now be driving a pink convertible; et cetera. If you are a professional, you can feel that you “made a mistake,” or, worse, that “mistakes were made,” when you failed to do the equivalent of buying the winning lottery ticket for your investors, and feel the need to apologize for your “reckless” investment strategy (that is, what seems reckless in retrospect).
  11. How can you get rid of such a persistent throb? Don’t try to willingly avoid thinking about it: this will almost surely backfire. A more appropriate solution is to make the event appear more unavoidable. Hey, it was bound to take place and it seems futile to agonize over it. How can you do so? Well, with a narrative. Patients who spend fifteen minutes every day writing an account of their daily troubles feel indeed better about what has befallen them. You feel less guilty for not having avoided certain events; you feel less responsible for it. Things appear as if they were bound to happen.
  12. If you work in a randomness-laden profession, as we see, you are likely to suffer burnout effects from that constant second-guessing of your past actions in terms of what played out subsequently. Keeping a diary is the least you can do in these circumstances.
  13. It happens all the time: a cause is proposed to make you swallow the news and make matters more concrete. After a candidate’s defeat in an election, you will be supplied with the “cause” of the voters’ disgruntlement. Any conceivable cause can do. The media, however, go to great lengths to make the process “thorough” with their armies of fact-checkers. It is as if they wanted to be wrong with infinite precision (instead of accepting being approximately right, like a fable writer).
  14. Adding the “because” makes these matters far more plausible, and far more likely. Cancer from smoking seems more likely than cancer without a cause attached to it—an unspecified cause means no cause at all.
  15. The first question about the paradox of the perception of Black Swans is as follows: How is it that some Black Swans are overblown in our minds when the topic of this book is that we mainly neglect Black Swans? The answer is that there are two varieties of rare events: a) the narrated Black Swans, those that are present in the current discourse and that you are likely to hear about on television, and b) those nobody talks about, since they escape models—those that you would feel ashamed discussing in public because they do not seem plausible. I can safely say that it is entirely compatible with human nature that the incidences of Black Swans would be overestimated in the first case, but severely underestimated in the second one.
  16. We learn from repetition—at the expense of events that have not happened before. Events that are nonrepeatable are ignored before their occurrence, and overestimated after (for a while). After a Black Swan, such as September 11, 2001, people expect it to recur when in fact the odds of that happening have arguably been lowered.
  17. The economist Hyman Minsky sees the cycles of risk taking in the economy as following a pattern: stability and absence of crises encourage risk taking, complacency, and lowered awareness of the possibility of problems. Then a crisis occurs, resulting in people being shell-shocked and scared of investing their resources.
  18. Terrorism kills, but the biggest killer remains the environment, responsible for close to 13 million deaths annually. But terrorism causes outrage, which makes us overestimate the likelihood of a potential terrorist attack—and react more violently to one when it happens. We feel the sting of man-made damage far more than that caused by nature.
  19. He tells you that his cousin (with whom he will celebrate the holidays) worked in a law office with someone whose brother-in-law’s business partner’s twin brother was mugged and killed in Central Park. Indeed, Central Park in glorious New York City. That was in 1989, if he remembers it well (the year is now 2007). The poor victim was only thirty-eight and had a wife and three children, one of whom had a birth defect and needed special care at Cornell Medical Center. Three children, one of whom needed special care, lost their father because of his foolish visit to Central Park. Well, you are likely to avoid Central Park during your stay. You know you can get crime statistics from the Web or from any brochure, rather than anecdotal information from a verbally incontinent salesman. But you can’t help it. For a while, the name Central Park will conjure up the image of that poor, undeserving man lying on the polluted grass. It will take a lot of statistical information to override your hesitation.
  20. Now, I do not disagree with those recommending the use of a narrative to get attention. Indeed, our consciousness may be linked to our ability to concoct some form of story about ourselves. It is just that narrative can be lethal when used in the wrong places.
  21. The way to avoid the ills of the narrative fallacy is to favor experimentation over storytelling, experience over history, and clinical knowledge over theories.
  22. These nonlinear relationships are ubiquitous in life. Linear relationships are truly the exception; we only focus on them in classrooms and textbooks because they are easier to understand.
  23. Making $1 million in one year, but nothing in the preceding nine, does not bring the same pleasure as having the total evenly distributed over the same period, that is, $100,000 every year for ten years in a row. The same applies to the inverse order—making a bundle the first year, then nothing for the remaining period.
  24. Let us separate the world into two categories. Some people are like the turkey, exposed to a major blowup without being aware of it, while others play reverse turkey, prepared for big events that might surprise others.
  25. A life saved is a statistic; a person hurt is an anecdote. Statistics are invisible; anecdotes are salient. Likewise, the risk of a Black Swan is invisible.
  26. In fact, economic growth comes from such risk taking. But some fool might argue the following: if someone followed reasoning such as mine, we would not have had the spectacular growth we experienced in the past. This is exactly like someone playing Russian roulette and finding it a good idea because he survived and pocketed the money.
  27. I am not dismissing the idea of risk taking, having been involved in it myself. I am only critical of the encouragement of uninformed risk taking.
  28. I insist on the following: that we got here by accident does not mean that we should continue to take the same risks.
  29. We have been playing Russian roulette; now let’s stop and get a real job.
  30. The reference point argument is as follows: do not compute odds from the vantage point of the winning gambler (or the lucky Casanova, or the endlessly bouncing back New York City, or the invincible Carthage), but from all those who started in the cohort.
  31. Evolution is a series of flukes, some good, many bad. You only see the good. But, in the short term, it is not obvious which traits are really good for you, particularly if you are in the Black Swan–generating environment of Extremistan. This is like looking at rich gamblers coming out of the casino and claiming that a taste for gambling is good for the species because gambling makes you rich! Risk taking made many species head for extinction!
  32. Worse, in a Black Swan environment, where one single but rare event can come shake up a species after a very long run of “fitness,” the foolish risk takers can also win in the long term!

The context around Che Guevara’s Motorcycle Diaries

“Chasing Che: A Motorcycle Journey in Search of the Guevara Legend” by Patrick Symmes

This is a highly amusing book where the author, journalist Patrick Symmes, traced back the journey that Ernesto Guevara and his buddy Alberto Granado took in 1952. Armed with a little more than Ernesto’s and Alberto’s diaries of the trip, in 1996 Symmes rode his BMW R80 G/S motorcycle and followed the footsteps that both Ernesto and Alberto took nearly 50 years before, searching for the people they met and places that they visited.

And it was pretty impressive, as he met Chichina herself (Ernesto’s girlfriend that they visited in the trip), traced down Oscar Von Puttkamer (whose family hosted Guevara and Granado during their trip), visited the fire station where the 2 boys helped to save a cat in a house fire, got himself written in a small town newspaper in Chile (just like Ernesto and Alberto), visited the lepers hospital that the 2 boys had come to see in Peru, among many others, including drinking himself blind in Cuba at the end of the trip with none other than Alberto Granado himself.

Along the journey, Symmes fill up the political, economic, and social contexts of each country that he visited; describing what’s going on during the 2 boys’ trip in 1952 and what have happened since then. Starting from the background of Ernesto’s family, his upbringing, even giving the context of Germans living in Argentina (which predated the fleeing Nazis). He then provided the explanation of the Chilean economic miracle (where as it turns out the rich got richer and the poor get poorer), the brutality of the Pinochet regime, and later told the stories of everyday struggles of people in Peru and Bolivia.

And as the trip proceeds he also paints a clearer picture on what happened with Ernesto that turned him into the fabled Che Guevara not long after the 1952 trip. To his credit, Symmes isn’t one of those groupie or blind follower of Che, but an objective journalist that can see both the positive and negative parts of things, including on Che’s conducts. Which makes this book objectively pleasing. And perhaps the best part of this book is, you don’t really need to read Ernesto’s diary beforehand (or watch The Motorcycle Diaries movie) as this book also narrates the 2 boys’ journey alongside his.

Moreover, the book is also Symmes’ tale of adventure by his own right, with him being a “gringo”, driving past the steepest mountains and the driest deserts, through wild animals and thieves and guerilla fighters. With crazy stories such as running out of gas in an Argentine desert, falling from the motorcycle and fracturing a rib cage, got bitten by a dog, meeting Douglas Tompkins (the founder of North Face and Esprit) and hanging out with him for a while, eating at a whorehouse, sleeping on top of a mass grave, sleeping at an abandoned gas station, witnessing rain in the Atacama desert (yes, there’s no recorded rain there, but there are short burst of rains every now and then), fell in love with almost every woman he met in Peru, visiting a prison to speak with the Shining Path revolutionaries, interviewing a man who was one of Che’s soldiers in Cuban revolution, speaking with Alberto Diaz Gutierrez (the photographer who took that most-famous picture of Che one overcast day in March 1960 – that became the icon of Che Guevarra), and so much more.

Near the end of the book, when Symmes was in Bolivia (Che’s final resting place long after the 1952 trip), he encountered several more books about Guevara: one written by his father, the other one written by Che’s travel companion in 1954, while Symmes also found Che’s diary in Bolivia. And it provides a much clearer picture over the Ernesto of 1952 that evolved into the Che of 1966, who became world famous for being the number 1 Guerilla, who has amassed a giant ego, and a lust for cold bloodedness.

All in all, the book is so very well written, even poetic at times, with bits of comedy every now and then that makes it thoroughly enjoyable to read. Absolutely superb.

How to be the master of social situations

“How to Work a Room: The Ultimate Guide to Making Lasting Connections – In Person and Online” by Susan Roane

According to a study on social anxiety reported in New York Times, a party with strangers is listed as the number one fear. In fact, it is said that if you didn’t have some anxiety about this, you would not be normal.

So how come some people looks very at ease when meeting strangers, and can operate among the crowds with effortless grace? This book might have the answer to this.

Written in 1988 and published in over 13 countries with multiple languages, this book has stood the test of time over more than 3 decades to be one of the formidable guides in this subject. And it immediately shows from the very first few paragraph, how the author herself, Susan Roane, aims at writing a simple but powerful book that will slowly guide us into the masters of social situations.

Here’s the main premise: We not only want to be comfortable in a social situation, but also want to make other people feel comfortable with us.

The book then breaks down the points into small sub-chapters and use stories as examples, covering multiple settings from professional, to casual, to reunion with old friends, to as gloomy as funerals. And in this 25 anniversary edition (2013) the book is also updated with skills in social media, although some of the things mentioned in here are already outdated today (like how to utilize Twitter’s 140 characters limitations, or how it still dwelling on Google+).

Unfortunately there are quite a few repetitions in the book and a lot of gibberish that makes the book unnecessarily longer than it needs, complete with cliche buzzwords every now and then. But the essence of it are still very good and important.

Here are the essence that I took from all over the place in the book: from the sub heading, part of a list, a quote in the middle of a sentence, the reverse meaning of a negative sentence, rephrasing of a sentence, a thought inspired by a sentence, or indeed the full sentence verbatim:

  1. Leave an impression that you’re the nice person that you are.
  2. Sincerity is the glue: Be warm and sincere, establish an honest rapport.
  3. Practice does makes it perfect. Attend as much gathering as you can to make you familiar with it.
  4. No one is boring when you discover their passion.
  5. Don’t wait to be properly introduced, instead introduce yourself.
  6. Try to find common interests. Or better yet, try to find common interests before you meet them = planning. Also figure out the general theme of the gathering, so that you can be prepare beforehand.
  7. Be an interested listener. Don’t judge.
  8. A good guest notice other guests who are standing alone, and start a conversation with them, and introduce them to other guests.
  9. A good guest pay attention, talk to spouses, significant others, and children.
  10. If you’re not sure, ask.
  11. Mindful of the theme of the gathering/party, prepare for it and dress accordingly. Bring a gift if appropriate, but not a gift that require additional work (like putting a flower in a vase and water them often).
  12. Be punctual, arrive 15 minutes earlier.
  13. Circulate, talk to everyone, and excuse yourself graciously.
  14. Read a lot, follow the news, so that you can have plenty of topics to talk about. But avoid controversial topics if you still don’t know where they stands.
  15. If someone makes a statement that you don’t agree with, just say “that’s one way to look at it”, or “that’s not the way I see it” or just simply a non-committal “Hmmm” or “interesting.” Avoid heated discussion, embrace a lively discussion.
  16. Help out the host, can be as little as helping to clear up the table.
  17. Snack before you go, and avoid overindulging on food and drink at the gathering.
  18. Do not text at a party, and never while talking to someone. Excuse yourself, go to somewhere discreet, send the text, and then go back to the scene. Avoid holding your phone at all.
  19. If someone is rude to you. Just move on, don’t waste your time trying to win them over.
  20. The most important trait millionaires have is their rolodex, their contacts or connections.
  21. Charm is a combination of warmth, good nature, positive attitude, a good sense of humor, charisma, spirit, energy, and interest on others. We can practice it, one by one.
  22. There is no more effective way to work a room than to be nice to everyone in a room. Treat people the way they want to be treated.
  23. Proofread for punctuation, spelling, and flow, before sending an online message.
  24. Never post anything on social media that you wouldn’t want your favourite grandpa or grandma to see.
  25. Embrace your shyness. Don’t wing it, but be genuine about it and still be accessible, make eye contact, smile, have few interesting topics to talk about, listen and pay attention.
  26. Practice your handshake. Not too strong, not too jelly, but firm and confidence.
  27. Avoid eating garlic and onion, or anything else that can leave a trace of smell on your breath.
  28. When about to enter a room, have a quick scan of where the main event is, where the food are, the exit, the stage maybe. And see where it’s best to position yourself (if it’s a standing party). And enter the room with confidence, walk towards people that you know or vaguely know (and introduce yourself).
  29. Or go together with a buddy, so that you always have each other to navigate the event with.
  30. If wearing a name tag, place it at the right side of your chest. Because it’s on the same line of sight as your right hand, making it easier for anyone to shake your hand and immediately see your name tag.
  31. Never ever ask, “do you remember me?”
  32. Avoid approaching 2 people that are having an intense conversation. You will just be disrupting.
  33. If someone interrupts you, acknowledge their presence or attempt to talk other topics, say to them that you need to finish this first and promise to catch up with them later. And actually catch up afterwards.
  34. To approach a group who are having fun, place yourself into the proximity of the group, first respond to their jokes or talks by facial expressions and joining the laughs, until you are included into the conversation, only then you start to also talk (but don’t divert the topics away).
  35. Always be mindful when you’re in the group and there’s someone else that is trying to join the conversation.
  36. End a conversation gracefully. Can be as simple as “excuse me”, or “I hope you enjoy the rest of the evening/party/conference/etc.” Or finish a comment, then smile, and extend you hand for a handshake, by saying it was nice talking to you. And move to the other side of the room.
  37. Before you leave, be sure to thank the host or hostess.
  38. When you’re wrong, sincerely apologize.
  39. Adapt a conversation according to age, profession, interest, etc.
  40. If possible, talk to the audience members before giving the talk. It will establish the personal connections needed before the talk even begun.
  41. A toast is not a roast. Be careful of spilling information that were meant to be private.
  42. Don’t presume informality, until it is offered.
  43. In a networking event, do not sit with your friends. You could do that at your leisure time eating pizza. You’re here to expand your network.
  44. Don’t be a know-it-all (even if you do know it all), it kills the conversation.
  45. Don’t ask “what’s your plan” to a potential retiree. It could put them in an awkward position, unless they tell it first themselves. Instead, congratulates them and tell stories about other retirees that could become an inspiration.
  46. Any connection made at an event, it means little unless you follow up the next day or two, in order to establish more connection.

The argument against old Indonesian way of thinking

“Madilog: Materialisme, Dialektika, dan Logika” Tan Malaka

This is an incredible insight into one of Indonesia’s intellectual thinkers, Tan Malaka. He was a controversial figure, who is now only historically famous for being one of the most influential early PKI members (the now-banned Communist Party) who set the ideological foundation of the party. But from reading his thoughts about so many range of knowledge, it seems that the censorship on him or the oversimplification of who he was, fail to capture his essence.

Hence my utter surprise when reading this book, where I had expected a leftist propaganda on communist thoughts, but found a very well-read person who seems to know a lot of things from a lot of things. And it is reflected in this book.

In here, he writes about his deep understanding of religion from Egyptian mythology, to “Hindustan religions”, to the Abrahamic religions, all the way to the arguments of atheism and the existence of ghosts. He talks science, even discussing the theories founded by the likes of Darwin, Galileo, Copernicus, Newton, Democritus, Gauss, Rutherford, and Einstein, among many others, including stories about Madam Currie. He covers history as diverse as Hitler’s Germany, the Nordic, the Hindustan, Aria and Tartar, Britain, France, Syrian, Roman, Jewish, African, and more. He also goes in depth with philosophy from Marx and Engels to Hume, Hegel, Plato, Aristotle, John Stuart Mill, Nietzsche, Gandhi, and many more.

And the best part is, he did not only present these knowledge to show off, but he showed how they are being implemented in various different cultures and societies in history. He then use all of these impressive knowledge to form his own formulation of an ideal state of thinking, which would eventually influence the formation of secular Indonesia.

But what is it really about? In its essence, the book explores the concept of his 3 main ideas: materialism, dialectics, and logic. It was written in 1943 during the Japanese occupation with the objective to teach the Indonesian people to move away from mystical thinking (that hinder progress and independence) and instead teaches a more scientific-based rational approach to understand and function in the world.

Firstly, materialism. Malaka argues that material reality is more essential to understanding the world, rather than supernatural, superstitious, or mystical forces (which was – and still is in some places – the main way of thinking in Indonesia). And he instead emphasized the role of economic and social conditions in measuring reality.

Secondly, dialectics (or investigating/discussing the truth of opinions), where he applies dialectical thinking to analyze social and economic occurrences, focusing on contradictions and conflicts that drive changes.

And then thirdly, logic, where he highlights the importance of logical thinkin in analyzing problems and in decision making, encouraging us to adopt a more rational and scientific approach.

The book particularly highlight the importance of education, and Malaka deeply ingrain these knowledge into his nationalist ideology where he advocated for Indonesian independence. And it is in the detailed examples that this book excels, where Malaka showed – for example – how even scientific findings by top scientists can be investigated and challenged.

All in all, despite being written even before Indonesia’s independence in 1945, the book’s teachings remain relevant today; underlining the importance of critical thinking, scientific approach, rational decision-making, and perhaps most importantly the intellectual courage to challenge the status quo.

These are things that are sadly still not very well taught in Indonesia even after 80 years, with the book was even banned during the Suharto regime for obvious reason (if the people are smart, they will be harder to control). Hence, the importance of this book and the urgent need to spread its ideas today.

The trip that gave birth to Che Guevara

“The Motorcycle Diaries: Notes on a Latin American Journey” by Ernesto Che Guevara

One day in the 1950s, a 23-year-old medical student Ernesto Guevara de la Serna decided to travel across Latin America on a motorcycle alongside a buddy, a 29-year-old biochemist Alberto Granado. They began their adventure from inside their native Argentina (December 1951) and proceeded to Chile (February 1952), Peru (March 1952), Colombia (June 1952), Venezuela (July 1952), and Miami by plane (Late July 1952), before returning back to Argentina by plane on August 1952.

Both men had decided to do this travel after one drunken night talking BS, with minimum planning, and they did so with only limited understanding of the continent from the history books.

This book is Ernesto’s diary entries from this trip. And it shows the rich cultures that they encountered, the interesting and kind people that they met, and the many crazy stories they had especially with their unreliable Norton motorbike La Poderosa II (“the mighty one”). It is filled with energy and wonder, bizarre antics from being broke, even humor and epic stupidness from many travel-adventure stories.

Stories such as entering Pachamams Kingdom and chewed coca leaves, visiting the ancient city of Cuzco, visiting Machu Picchu, getting into a local newspaper in Chile, visiting a leper colony, sleeping at strangers’ homes, many strangers’ homes, hitchhiking to everywhere (after La Poderosa totally collapsed), assisting fire fighters rescuing animals from fire, working as a crew member at a boat, walking across desert, meeting an indigenous village, sailing down the Amazon River using a made-up raft, fell asleep in their raft and accidentally entered the Brazil’s side of Amazon, joining a local football match, playing another football match in Peru (this time alongside a butch-looking nun), and another football match in Colombia (where he as a goalkeeper saved a penalty in a cup final that they joined).

And like plenty of other travel-adventure stories they also had numerous unfortunate shortcomings, such as falling from their bike several times, had a diarrhea, got trampled by a horse, got their path disrupted by a landslide, running away from an unpaid meal, being chased by furious dancers in a village, finding themselves in a politically heated Colombia with several open revolts in the countryside, had a flat tire in Venezuela, had numerous asthma attacks throughout the journey, and very often being hungry and needed the mercy from the locals to feed them.

But more importantly, the diary also shows the development of Ernesto’s views on the often-unreported everyday realities of the majority of the people in that continent. Starting with the sick elderly woman that he met in Valparaíso, then the poor miners in Chuquicamata, and perhaps the most touching the friendly Indians or Mestizos who saved them when they were so close to freezing to death. Indeed, during this trip, he also saw all sorts of poverty and injustices from the ground up that opened his eyes and awakened his political views, making this trip his formative journey that has since turned him into the fabled Che Guevara.

After this trip, Ernesto formally graduated as a doctor in 1953 and almost immediately set for another journey around Latin America, from Bolivia (where he witnessed the Bolivian Revolution), to Peru, Ecuador, Panama, Costa Rica, and Guatemala (where he met Antonio Lopez, a young Cuban revolutionary). In Guatemala 1954 he saw the overthrow of the democratically-elected government of Jacobo Arbenz by US-backed forces (unleashed by the United Fruit Company), an event that profoundly radicalized his political views, where he then escaped to Mexico and contacted the group of Cuban revolutionary exiles.

In 1955 he finally met Fidel Castro and immediately enlisted in the Cuban guerilla expedition to overthrow the US-backed dictator Fulgencio Batista, earning the nickname “Che” (a popular form of conversational address in Argentina). After Batista eventually fled on 1 January 1959, Che filled several positions in the new Cuban government, first as head of the Department of Industry of the National Institute of Agrarian Reform, then as president of the National Bank, Minister of Industry, as well as becoming a central leader of the political organization that in 1965 became the Communist Party of Cuba. Che also represented Cuba around the world, heading several delegations and speaking at the UN and other international forums.

Che left Cuba in April 1965, initially to lead another guerilla mission to support the Congo revolution. But he returned to Cuba secretly in December 1965 to prepare for another guerilla force for Bolivia, only to be wounded, captured, and eventually killed by CIA-trained Bolivian troops on 8 October 1967, at the age of 39.

It is pretty astonishing that 16 years prior to his tragic death Ernesto was travelling from Buenos Aires at the south to Caracas at the northern tip of Latin America as a young and free doctor. But the Ernesto that left Argentina was not the same person that arrived in Venezuela more than half a year later.

It is actually a story that inspired me to take on a backpacking journey on a shoestring during my university years (in Europe, for 3 weeks, where I eventually met my future wife), after I first watched The Motorcycle Diaries movie more than 2 decades ago. It was (and still is) one of my top favourite movies of all time.

Perspectives from the other side of the story

“What the Dog Saw: And Other Adventures” by Malcolm Gladwell

This is a series of essays by Malcolm Gladwell that were featured in the New Yorker, where Gladwell has been a staff writer since 1996. These dozen+ selected essays are handpicked by Gladwell himself, which he said to be his favorites from his entire career span at the New Yorker. And they are indeed the most mind-bending bunch.

The book is broken down into 3 sections. The first is about obsessive people and minor geniuses: not Einstein, Churchill or Mandela; but true to Gladwell’s style he writes about amazing successful people who are nearly unknown outside their area of expertise, like the founder of Chop-O-Matic, or the writer Ben Fountain, or the criminal behaviour analyst that looks straight from a Criminal Minds episode. The second section is dedicated to theories: how we should see the collapse of Enron, or plagiarism, or disaster such as the crash of JFK Jr’s plane. The third section dives deep into predictions: how do we know whether someone is smart, or bad, or capable of doing something extraordinary.

And this is where the Gladwelian twist comes, as Gladwell explains, “In the best of these pieces, what we think isn’t the issue. Instead, I’m more interested in describing what people who think about homelessness or ketchup or financial scandals think about homelessness or ketchup or financial scandals. I don’t know what to conclude about the Challenger crash. It’s gibberish to me — neatly printed indecipherable lines of numbers and figures on graph paper. But what if we look at that problem through someone else’s eyes, from inside someone else’s head?”

Indeed, seeing a problem through someone else’s perspective, like in the case of Cesar Millan, the dog whisperer. Just with the touch of his hand, Millan can amazingly calm down even the angriest and most troubled dogs. We must be wondering what is going on inside Millan’s head as he performs his miracles? Or better yet, what goes on inside the dog’s head?

This is what this book is ultimately all about, what the dog saw.

Pramoedya from the eyes of his English translator

“Indonesia Tidak Hadir di Bumi Manusia: Pramoedya, Sejarah, dan Politik” by Max Lane

In the world of Pramoedya Ananta Toer, the author of this book, Max Lane, should not need any introduction.

Like the fifth Beatle to John, Paul, George, and Ringo, I consider Max Lane as the “fourth member” of the mighty force of Hasta Mitra publishing trio: Pramoedya Ananta Toer (writer), Joesoef Isak (editor), and Hasyim Rachman (editor in chief); plus Max Lane as the unsung hero who translated the books into English language and spread them to the international stage.

And as Pram’s translator, and as the only remaining one of the 4 that is still alive, his insight into Pram’s ideas can be considered as the closest thing to Pram’s own way of thinking.

This book is exactly that, Lane’s memoir into Pramoedya and his works. While “Indonesia out of Exile” (by Lane as well) was the biography of the Hasta Mitra trio, this book dive deeper into Pram’s views and how his harsh experiences shaped his ideas for the books.

For example, it’s been established in plenty of Pram’s biographies that he was arrested in 1960 by Soekarno’s regime for his writing. But this book explains more about which writings in particular: his essays that criticize the government for subjected the Chinese community of abuse, banning them from doing business outside the provincial capital cities, with right-wing politicians scapegoating them for the economic troubles (with all of the essays then compiled into a book “Hoakiau in Indonesia”).

This book also shows that despite being jailed by the Soekarno regime, Soekarno himself had nothing to do with it and was unable to release Pram from prison, and that Pram remains loyal to Soekarno’s vision of Indonesia and that the “revolution is not over yet.” It shows how chaotic 1950s-1960s politics were in Indonesia, where Soekarno’s backers such as PNI and PKI were outnumbered by the Military (who had seats in the parliament) and right-wing parties.

However, it is also important to note that although Soekarno did not initiate the discriminative laws, he also did not stop it for going into effect, because his priority is political stability between the nationalist, religious, and communist factions. A political compromise at the huge cost of the Chinese and subsequently Pramoedya’s unjust imprisonment.

Indeed, the book shows the chaotic reality of Indonesian revolution. Not only in the 1940s struggle for independence, but also in 1950-1960s unstable era of post-independence, the Suharto dictatorship era, and even way back in the Majapahit era by discussing Pram’s trilogy of “Arok Dedes”, “Arus Balik”, and “Mangir” that show the DNA of nationalism without mentioning the name Indonesia and the uprising against unjust rulers (something that has never changed, hence it is why Pram said the revolution is not over yet).

All in all, the book feels like a director’s cut of a great movie, a further commentary over Pram’s greatest thinking and greatest works. But it can also treated, if you must, as a cheat book to read if you don’t have the time to read all of the 2000 pages of Buru Quartet or his many other books. This book alone meets the very minimum for a basic introduction to all of his main ideas.

But of course, if you only read this one you’re missing out on Pram’s masterpiece deep dive into Indonesian history, and the many ideas of one of the greatest Indonesian thinkers of all time.

A hilarious book about life at oilfields (Part 2)

“This is Not A Drill: Just Another Glorious Day in the Oilfield” by Paul Carter

In his first memoir, first published in 2006, Paul Carter said see you in 15 years. And that’s exactly what he did with this 2nd book. This time around he is more mature, more serious, and writing a memoir that shows his growth as he progressed up the corporate ladder in the oil industry.

Just kidding. This 2nd book was written merely 1-2 years after the first one, and in this one our “Pauli” is still the same legend that seems to attract chaos and drunken shenanigans wherever he goes.

This time around he travelled to exciting places once again, from Japan, to Bangladesh, to West Africa, and a lot more in between, including Scotland where he got so drunk at one time that he ended up tongue-kissing a border collie. In this sequel he also got stuck in the middle of the Russian sea on a rig staffed by colourful rig-mates with nicknames such as Sickboy, Vodka Bob, or my favourite The Cunt of Monte Cristo. He tells the story when he witnessed a pistol duel, almost died in a rig collapse, meeting a Hannibal Lecter type of character, and the most epic story: going out with his childhood friends that ended horribly wrong involving a poop in a purse and stealing a taxi.

Granted, this time around the book really does feel a tad bit more serious, where Pauli dived deeper into the politics of oil, especially during the time when he was on the ground in Afghanistan and seeing first-hand the devastating impacts from wars in the name of oil. He also dwell even deeper at the last chapter when he writes about his real view on the oil industry as the engine of global capitalism, which shows the rare perspective from an honest executioner of the drilling.

This second book also feels more mature and intimate, where he shares his story about reconnecting with his father (and had an epic night out with his dad’s friends at a gentlemen’s club), tells about his proposal to Claire, proceeded with the wedding, and the upcoming kid. Indeed, our boy is finally growing up, and while the ending of book 1 feels a bit sudden (and leaving me to want for more) this 2nd book nicely concludes his epic tale with an apropriate end.

Tolstoy’s utopian mindset to live life lightly

“Alyosha the Pot” by Leo Tolstoy

This short story is so refreshing, looking at life from a completely different angle. Published in 1905, it teaches us that we don’t have to have ego and opinion to live this life, and instead we can just work hard at anything that’s being given to us, with a smile on our face, without any complain and comparison.

Yes, as we see in the story, the downside of this approach is we don’t get to dictate our lives the way we want (which is part of ego), but life looks so much lighter and easier when leaving all to faith or nature or circumstance, without having to bother or worry about personal ambition.

Of course, I can never live the way Alyosha lived, I think none of us can. Heck, even he eventually cracked when he found someone he loves but wasn’t allowed to marry. I guess that’s just being human.

But I see the novel as somekind of utopian mind state that we cannot possibly achieve but serves as the ideal goal. Who knows, maybe getting as close as we can to that mind state (i.e. living life with less ego, less opinion, less complain, less comparing, and – dare I said it – less ambition) might just be the healthy antithesis of living a stressful life because of our struggles to reach our ambition, our opinions on what things should be, our complain of injustice or hardship; all of which are making it harder to bear.

And in contrast, look at how it ended with Alyosha. Sure, he had nothing, knew little, achieved little, didn’t get what he wants; but he also live life lightly, with no burden, with no friction between what’s happening and what he thinks should happen, without a care in the world, and with an incredible calm acceptance of his last fate. Now that at least mount to something.